Highly descriptive post, I enjoyed that bit. Will there be a part 2?
http://www.RESTURANTDEALS.EU

"Innocent until proven guilty" is why they say allegedly. Everyone has a right to fair trial in America. Think about all of the people wrongfully arrested. They "allegedly" did what they were arrested for and with due process, they proved otherwise.

Don't like innocent until proven guilty? Get out of America then. I'm sure Saudi Arabia would love your ideas!

All news organizations have to say "allegedly" because until anyone is proven to be guilty in a court of law, they are allegedly (read that "possibly") a criminal. Zoobie, how would you like it if we took a photo of one of you or on eof your loved ones and wrote: "This is Mr. Irving X who is a child molester." And, as it turns out, Mr. X is not found guilty. What we just did was commit what is known in legal circles is known as libel (slander is the same thing but it is the spoken version as opposed to the printed version) and we could be prosecuted criminally and civilly for that offense. So, until and UNLESS a guilty verdict is reached, one must say "allegedly".

I think most of that lip is genetically induced. But it looks like the homeowner got a bit of the action this time according to the report. I wouldn't blame the cops just yet (if that is what you are implying. Not sure if I understand your comment.)

....or they could turn out like the guy in this mug shot who was busted on a Felony charge and went on to control the Republican Party.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/mugshots/celebrity/politics/rush-limbaugh

Nice try Steve - I guess Clinton and BO had some connections to avoid getting busted

There is no point...Patch is promoting bad news with no possible good outcome...

Agree.

Rush Limbaugh controls the Republican PArty. He says "Jump!" and the feeble minded say "How high?"

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/topoftheticket/la-na-tt-republican-limbaugh-20120305,0,3858427.story

"Now there is a man whose growth got stunted using a cigar, shaking hands with a man at the Democratic Convention who used some sort of illegal chemical."

You sound jealous.

Wall St. et al control the Republican Party. Wall St. et al control the Democratic Party.

Rush Limbaugh is an entertainer. When/if he walks into the booth on election day, he could vote communist as far as we know. He could be a drag queen. All we know of him is his hot air that we hear over the airwaves.

If Limbaugh controls the GOP then the Communist Party USA controls the Democrat party. Or the New Black Panthers do. Either way.....they follow both.

This, fiscally speaking.
He and his pledge are the reason compromises on our nation's fiscal future aren't met.

Just today, President Obama said he was willing to "cut $2.50 in spending, for every $1 in revenue raised via taxes".
I'll try and find a source, but I heard it this morning on satillite radio (POTUS).

here we go:
http://thehill.com/video/administration/248335-obama-more-than-happy-to-work-with-republicans-on-deficit-deal

2.5 to 1? That's essentially 71% spending cuts do 29% revenue/tax increases.

Anyone who can't agree to this type of formula for reducing our national debt simply isn't rational in my view.

In fact, this type of spending reduction he's agreed to would make tax and spend liberals like O'Malley cringe. Could you imagine if O'Malley had to accept this?

That would be great but coming from the mouth of a pathological liar Obama it means nothing.
As he said in 2008, ‘You know what? We’re going to keep on trying a bunch of stuff until something works."

Cuts are not making Governor Cuomo cringe. He is fighting the unions and cutting spending.

So Joe, your counterargument to this is simply "well Obama is lying", and taking a quote from 2008, before he even was technically President.

Besides, it's not like the previous administrations policies 'worked'. Unless you call reckless war spending (money, and lives ruined) and bad tax cuts when the economy was healthy good working policies.

Besides, you want to talk about lying and flipping? Please, look at your own candidates with an objective eye sometime - hard as that may be.

The real issue with this Democrat side, is although President Obama probably would follow through with it, he'd be just as likely to get his party to agree with it as Boehner would getting the Republicans to break their blood oath on increased taxation.

Both sides are fundamentally broken. I do think Obama is trying, in this particular aspect, though. I also think Boehner did...but much like Obama, his hands are also tied by his radical kooks.

"So Joe, your counterargument to this is simply "well Obama is lying", and taking a quote from 2008, before he even was technically President."

TOOOOO funny! Politics according to Tim: Anything said by Obama prior to his swearing in is off limits.

Going back to Romney's high school and college days are perfectly acceptable.

heahahahahahaha

Obama said more than once he is a Muslim. One NEVER NEVER NEVER mistakes their own faith. Here is an excellent series of articles on just this subject of Obama being a Muslim.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/sep/7/obama-i-have-never-been-a-muslim/

"Middle East and Islam specialist Daniel Pipes begins his inquiry into Barack Obama’s early Muslim connections by noting the president’s autobiographical inaccuracies. A focus on openness and honesty is likely to hurt Mr. Obama far more than Mr. Romney. Mr. Obama remains the mystery candidate with an autobiography full of gaps and even fabrications. For example, to sell his autobiography in 1991, Mr. Obama claimed that he “was born in Kenya.” He lied about never having been a member and candidate of the 1990s Chicago socialist New Party. When Stanley Kurtz produced evidence to establish that he was a member, Mr. Obama’s flacks smeared and dismissed Mr. Kurtz. Mr. Obama’s 1995 autobiography, “Dreams from My Father,” contains a torrent of inaccuracies and falsehoods about his maternal grandfather, his father, his mother, his parents’ wedding, his stepfather’s father, his high school friend, his girlfriend, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. As Victor Davis Hanson put it, “If a writer will fabricate the details about his own mother’s terminal illness and quest for insurance, then he will probably fudge on anything.”

"Into this larger pattern of mendacity about his past life arises the question of Mr. Obama’s discussion of his faith, perhaps the most singular and outrageous of his lies.

Asked about the religion of his childhood and youth, Mr. Obama offers contradictory answers. He finessed a March 2004 question, “Have you always been a Christian?” by replying: “I was raised more by my mother and my mother was Christian.” But in December 2007, he belatedly decided to give a straight answer: “My mother was a Christian from Kansas. I was raised by my mother. So, I’ve always been a Christian.” In February 2009, however, he offered a completely different account:

“I was not raised in a particularly religious household. I had a father who was born a Muslim but became an atheist, grandparents who were non-practicing Methodists and Baptists, and a mother who was skeptical of organized religion. I didn’t become a Christian until I moved to the South Side of Chicago after college.”

He further elaborated on this answer in September 2010, saying, “I came to my Christian faith later in life. Which is it? Has Mr. Obama “always been a Christian” or did he “become a Christian” after college?"

"Self-contradiction on so fundamental a matter of identity, when added to the general questioning about the accuracy of his autobiography, raises questions about veracity. Would someone telling the truth say such varied and opposite things about himself? Inconsistency is typical of fabrication: When making things up, it’s hard to stick with the same story. Was he the areligious child of irreligious parents? Or was he always a Christian? A Muslim? Or was he, in fact, something of his own creation — a Christian Muslim? Mr. Obama provides some information on his Islamic background in his two books, “Dreams from My Father” and “The Audacity of Hope” (2006). In 2007, when Hillary Rodham Clinton was still the favored Democratic candidate for president, a number of reporters dug up information about Mr. Obama’s time in Indonesia. His statements as president have provided important insights into his mentality. The major biographies of Mr. Obama, however, whether friendly (such as those by David Maraniss, David Mendell and David Remnick) or hostile (such as those by Jack Cashill, Jerome R. Corsi, Dinesh D’Souza, Aaron Klein, Edward Klein and Stanley Kurtz), devote little attention to this topic. I shall establish his having been born and raised a Muslim, provide confirming evidence from recent years, survey the perceptions of him as a Muslim, and place this deception in the larger context of Mr. Obama’s autobiographical fictions."

Noting about the post is birtherism. It only uses Obama's own words, books and the known factor about him. IF you had read it you would have known Mr Glass House resident racist who hate blacks and especially black women.

You are actually calling that "pandering" and comparing it to Flip Flop Romney and Lyin' Ryan?

Mormonism isn't a faith. It's a cult.

Joe, Steve doesn't even know who he is. With his three AKA's he can form his own cult.

Beeker doesn't even know who he is. I guess that Road Rage induced Oldtimers took it's toll.

Beeker was the Milton from "Office Space" of the BCPD.

Buzz, I wasn't taking a cheap shot at you at all. I didn't understand your original comment. I wasn't sure what you were getting at when you wrote "or was he broken out". It seemed like you were implying that the cops got the better half of him when he was being hauled out of the house. I was asking clarification on your comment. I was hoping that some of the damage was from the police when he was resisting arrest. Chillin doesn't take cheap shots at people that can write and spell and convey a cognitive thought, no matter what their opinion is. I like making fun of idiots that make the crime report for being stupid. or making fun of the idiot friends of theirs that defend their actions. You are not the latter. Chillin doesn't make things serious. Ain't no hatein' goin' on here, just chillin.

Yes it does clear things up. Short posts can be misunderstood sometimes.

That is what I say. The truth does not have to bite me, it speaks for itself.

I tired to tell you a long time ago about your language and comments you were making. I tried to tell you it was not the mature thing to do and it only demeaned you. You choose not to listen.

Others have spoken about you but that too falls on deaf ears. You reap what you sow.

LOL.

While you're at it maybe you should include the Wikipedia article on "libel."

He is nothing different than the bullies that torment the school shooters. Absolutely no different.

ONLY in response to the same unwarranted slime you and others have an endless amount of.