patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Controversial Ruxton Group Home Moving Forward

Sheppard Pratt closes on purchase of large home on Labelle Avenue.

 

Updated (7:21 p.m.)—"No retreat."

That's the statement on lawn signs, window signs, flyers and banners in this quiet Ruxton neighborhood, where residents are embroiled in a standoff with Sheppard Pratt Health System officials over a proposed eight-patient transitional group home.

Last Friday, the hospital closed on its $1.39 million purchase of a home in the 1500 block of Labelle Avenue, just off Bellona Avenue and behind Graul's Market. The six-bedroom, five-bathroom looks out of place among its neighbors.

Residents did not find out about the prospective sale until it was under contract and nearly complete, when hospital officials emailed community leaders on Apr. 15. The ensuing uproar led to community meetings, protests and dueling newspaper commentaries.

The property was sold in 2008 for $475,000 to James and Kathleen Carroll, who, according to state property tax records, used it as their primary residence. In 2009, the Carrolls finished the new home there, which a real estate listing now prices at $1,685,000.

Residents resent accusations of discrimination made in a Baltimore Sun editorial, and say this isn't about the fact that the Towson mental hospital will house patients there.

"I'm not afraid of the residents that will be in there," said Marian Knott, who lives directly across Labelle Avenue from the proposed group home. "It has nothing to do with that."

Rather, the residents worry more about increased traffic and parking disrupting the neighborhood. They want neighbors who will have "a stake in the community," Knott said.

"We do not dispute the need or the merit of the program, but we do dispute the characterization of this facility as anything other than a for-profit business that more appropriately belongs on the Sheppard Pratt campus," Kathy Mountcastle, president of the Ruxton-Riderwood-Lake Roland Area Improvement Association, said in an email.

That's the biggest question from residents: Why here?

Transitional group homes do best in residential neighborhoods, said Bonnie Katz, a hospital spokeswoman. Buying a suitable home is also much cheaper than building one themselves.

"If we were to build something anywhere, it would probably be two years before all is said and done," she said.

Katz denied allegations that the hospital was merely in it for profit and said some residents appear to have a "lack of clarity" about the project.

"I don't know why people are saying what they're saying," she said. "I can only correct the misperceptions."

Katz denies that they "conspired" with the Carrolls to build the house in 2009. Instead the property was picked from a short list of "fewer than five" homes in a property search, she said. The hospital chose the Ruxton house for its size and proximity to its Towson campus.

On Wednesday, some workers could be seen inspecting the home. Katz said no new construction is currently planned there, and could not offer a target date for when the group home would open. Katz said the hospital would set up lines of communication for concerned neighbors.

The Baltimore Sun reported that more than 200 residents attended an emotional community meeting on the hospital campus shortly after the purchase was announced in mid-April.

The Labelle Avenue home will house low-risk patients, most of whom are suffering from depression and anxiety and transitioning from the hospital's $2,000-per-night Retreat facility. The Labelle Avenue home would be staffed around the clock, to satisfy regulations. Patients would pay $600 per night, Katz said.

"To me, it's not a group home," Knott said. "It's just a place where they're going to house patients who want treatment ... that's not a neighborhood to me."

In remarks at the April meeting, Kathy Palencar, a former president of the Ruxton-Riderwood-Lake Roland Area Improvement Association and the head of the association's zoning committee, said in prepared remarks that regardless of who would be living there, such a large-scale residence would be "out of step" with the community.

"Multiple residents and staff coming and going will have an adverse affect on traffic and parking in what is already a congested neighborhood," she said. "The site is located in an established residential neighborhood, and would be unprecedented in this part of Baltimore County."

Residents continue to fight the plan with protests and messages on a website.

County Councilwoman Vicki Almond, a Reisterstown Democrat who represents Ruxton, said there's nothing in county law to keep the hospital from opening a group home in the neighborhood. Final approval rests in the state licensing process. Mountcastle said the community has not yet decided whether to challenge it.

"I don't think the community is going to give up their fight very easily," Almond said. "I think it's going to be a very difficult situation."

John Patterson

9:15 pm on Wednesday, May 4, 2011

These are, after all, some of the same people who opposed an elementary school built in their neighborhood. I'm actually not really sure why anyone would WANT to live near them.

Reply

Neversure

10:20 pm on Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Group homes are allowed in neighborhoods by law. Lots of neighborhoods have them. The residents of the home are otherwise our neighbors and family members.
The people of Ruxton who oppose this group home simply believe they are better than the rest of us.
This is simply an issue of NIMBY.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Amy

4:07 pm on Friday, May 6, 2011

Sheppard Pratt has made it clear that the patients at the Ruxton center will be from out-of-state. They are in no way "our" neighbors , family members, or even "residents". They are simply strangers passing through for a short stay, exactly like guests at an extended stay hotel. I suspect you would be against a facility like this if it was in your back yard, and not because you think you are better than anyone else. As far as group homes go, see my comment below...

Mary Jane Blaustein

7:31 am on Thursday, May 5, 2011

Had the hospital made an appropriate effort to communicate and inform the residents of Ruxton of the intention to use the property as a group home perhaps the issue would not have become so contentious. I lived in the neighborhood near this location for many years and I understand the concern. Shame on an institution that is an expert in human behavior and communication for not anticipating this reaction. Never mind what the law allows or doesn,t allow , goodwill and accurate information would have avoided this whole situation.

Reply

J Thomas

9:44 am on Friday, May 6, 2011

This is a for profit business going in a residential neighborhood. Does this open the gate for a commercial business to buy property and set up shop next door. Perhaps a subway. Open late for those midnight munchies.

Reply

Amy

1:30 pm on Friday, May 6, 2011

This is not a GROUP HOME. The FHA was designed to provide PERMANENT homes for people with mental and physical disabilities that would otherwise have nowhere else to live. The residents of group homes become their own "family" and can be beneficial to the neighborhood. This OUTPATIENT TREATMENT FACILITY will have a constantly changing population of strangers with no financial or emotional ties to the neighborhood or greater community. It has nothing to do with what anyone thinks about the residents of Ruxton. I don't live in Ruxton, but I sure wouldn't want it to happen next door to me. Can you imagine never knowing who will be on the other side of the fence when you send your children out into the yard to play? Sheppard Pratt insists that these residents will be affluent (as though that makes any difference) and that they will not pose any threat to the community. They also said that about the boy who murdered the staff member in the same kind of "home" on their campus. If they can't control what happens on their campus, what makes anyone think they can control what happens in the Ruxton facility? As far as anyone who insinuates that NIMBY is a bad thing- you know you'd feel the same way if it was happening next door to you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

nor

5:27 pm on Friday, May 6, 2011

@ Amy and others: You state you don't live in the neighborhood so you aren't aware of the Ruxton kid who killed his Mom and attempted to kill his Dad. Or the Lutherville-Timonium/Cockeysville kid who killed his family. You act as if they are housing sexual predators next door, which by the way, may already exist in your neighborhood with a "permanent" resident or neighbor of yours or one of their friends or family who come to visit. The residents of Ruxton who oppose the house don't mind the traffic flow when they shop at Wal Mart and Target in everyone else's neighborhood. Or the light rail stops that exist in Mt. Washington and Lutherville, but not in Ruxton. Or Meadowwood Park at Falls and Joppa Road where the kids play and the traffic flows...just NIMBY in Ruxton. Where will they shop? Will they shop at the local stores like Graul's? Fillup at the gas stations in Ruxton as "they come and go". Homes already exist in other neighborhoods, just not in the $1.6 million area. Oh, and the no new elementary school in my neighborhood battle that occurred. Anywhere but not near me. Or the illegal signs the "no retreat" group is posting to poles throughout Ruxton. Fact.. these homes do not decrease property values in neighborhoods, so research the facts beforehand. Oh and the traffic flow for sending your kids to private schools in my neighborhood and increasing the traffic flow in my area. Contact the realtor who wrote to support the homeowners and sell your house thru her.

K Blue

2:05 pm on Friday, May 6, 2011

Who is the purchaser of record? Will they be paying property taxes on this million-dollar plus home? Will they be paying land recordation taxes on this sale? If they don't have to pay these taxes, how much will the County lose this year and every year going forward?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Tyler Waldman

2:23 pm on Friday, May 6, 2011

Sheppard Pratt is buying it and since they are a non-profit, that means the county will lose the property taxes on the property. I'm not sure how much that would be offhand, but the property value is noted in the story.

Amy

5:40 pm on Friday, May 6, 2011

Not sure who nor is or the other "no name" person who responded to my post. You said, and I quote "research the facts beforehand". Perhaps you should heed your own advice. The teenager who killed his mother lived on Alston road in Thornleigh, not Ruxton, and the other one who killed his whole family was in Cockeysville, not Lutherville. Not that that matters, but don't tell others to research facts when you can't be bothered to do so yourself. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and yours differs from mine, but there is no need to be so nasty.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Tyler Waldman

11:30 am on Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Sheppard Pratt CEO Dr. Steven Sharfstein and resident Tom Costello will be on Midday on WYPR today at noon to discuss the facility.

Reply

kt

12:52 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

I definitely sympathize with the homeowners in Ruxton. Especially in light of what has come out about this expansion in the news recently.

I just saw on the Neighbors Against Sheppard Pratt site that a lawsuit has been filed against Sheppard Pratt and others attempting to expand The Retreat.

You can find more information and the legal complaint at the website http://www.naspgh.com .

Reply

Leave a comment