Unless the Baltimore County Board of Education reverses itself, as of the 2015-16 school year, siblings of elementary magnet school children will not be automatically admitted to the school with their older brother or sister.
The revised rule (as of Apr. 7) states that "kindergarten priority placements will no longer be granted beginning with the 2015-2016 school year" (see Article VI.A.1).
This means, if you have a child at a magnet school and your younger child is not admitted via random lottery, you will be forced to either take your older child out of the school they've attended in previous years or send your elementary age children to two separate schools.
Information regarding consideration of the repeal should have been disseminated, prior to the decision, to all school communities potentially affected by it. This situation is another example of the school system making important policy changes without ensuring that proper communication, consideration of various perspectives, and deliberation have occurred.
Tom Irwin Jr.
PTA President-elect
Cromwell Valley Elementary Regional Magnet School of Technology
Towson, MD
Kristin Strong
3:53 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Once again stakeholders are left out of the loop.
Sue Battle-McDonald
3:59 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
The Balt Co BoE has no clue about how to properly involve stakeholders. Another reason we need an elected board, not an appointed one like we have now.
Concerned Citizen
4:20 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Tom, you and your wife are getting out of control with your demands on the school system. Your first kid should have never got in. Let's look at how that happened. Sense of entitlement is baffling
Lily
6:03 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
I believe everyone's first kid gets in because of the lottery. It seems to me that anyone who has a desire to change the sibling priority placement rule should educate themselves in public policy first. The sibling priority rule exists to mitigate a hardship placed on parents who otherwise would not be able to participate in the program if their children had to attend different schools. Without it the magnet program would quickly become accessible to only the gentry, and those with enough money to mitigate the hardship. It is also for the benefit of the attending student. If their sibling is permitted in then they will not be pulled out threatening the stability of the whole program.
Donna King
4:58 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
If you are going to attack someone's character, you should use your real name. I am glad that Tom is challenging this ill-advised change.
Rus Vanwestervelt
8:48 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Disgusted, your "argument" is flawed in all ways. The first three paragraphs of this post include nothing more than objective, factual information that all parents of elementary-aged children attending Baltimore County Public Schools, now or in the immediate future, should know. Mr. Irwin's fourth paragraph, is a subjective statement on the board's ineffectiveness to communicate clearly to its community.
I see no mention of Mr. Irwin's wife in this post.
I see no "out of control" demands on the school system (unless you believe clear communication to be an outrageous expectation).
I see no mention of Mr. Irwin's children.
I see no sense of entitlement.
Disgusted, if you have personal issues with Mr. Irwin, please communicate them through the proper, private means and not in a public forum; dropping petty, erroneous comments anonymously is both divisive and immature and does nothing to help parents look out for our children's best interests.
I, for one, am grateful for Mr. Irwin's initiative to communicate effectively with his fellow neighbors and others throughout the surrounding communities. As far as I am concerned, this is exactly what an effective leader does, and I look forward to Mr. Irwin's leadership over the next year.
Erin Dickensheets
9:18 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
http://www.bcps.org/system/policies_rules/policies/1000Series/POL1220.PDF
It's seems that this policy was neglected. Perhaps we could use this as recourse...
Karl
2:03 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
I have rarely read such two-faced drivel. This reads like a Jonathan Swift or Lewis Carroll novel. Policy 1220 conveniently disregards dissent. Rather than listen, the APPOINTED board APPOINTS a committee. Even then the board may totally, WITHOUT QUESTION disregard any committee recommendations. There are no consequences for the board's failures.
"What we have here is a failure to communicate." (Cool Hand Luke)
Bart
9:52 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
What a ridiculous change for Baltimore County to have made. I, also am thankful that Mr. Irwin has brought this to light. Parental involvement is crucial to proper education of the students. Splitting families in this way is a guaranteed way to discourage it.
Perhaps the new superintendent can correct it.
Disgusted, you need to get over whatever problem you have with this man. Your comments are unwarranted.
Susana Barrios
11:34 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012
It sounds to me that the problem is that a decision was made without asking the stakeholders input, it does not matter where you stand on the issue, decions about our children's education need to include us. My daughter's attend Lutherville Lab, it is overcrowded to the poin where they have 6 trailers, maybe more next school year, I think that we couldn't handle more children, and this would be a good idea for our school, but maybe this is not the case in other magnet schools, I would like to hear the arguments of both sides, it is only fair.
Lily
6:05 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
This rule change will not affect the number of children who get into the magnet program. It will only affect how they are chosen. It will not affect overcrowding at Lutherville at all.
Amy
12:18 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
While I think that "Disgusted" could have been more respectful with his/her comments, I understand the frustration. There is no reason why there should be magnet schools at the elementary level. Children under the age of 12 should not be specializing in anything yet. It is a ridiculous concept taken advantage of by residents in low performing school districts in order to send their kids to a better school. But regardless of my opinion, if you believe that some children are "gifted" enough to warrant a special program, then why should their younger siblings get to take up the space that other "gifted" children should be considered for? Plenty of families send their children to different schools for many different reasons. Considering the fact that the County even buses the kids in, it shouldn't create too much of a problem for anyone. And if you don't like the County's decision, you could send all of your children to your home school. As a matter of fact, if Cromwell Valley was a home school as it should be, it would alleviate some of the overcrowding in the other Towson area elementary schools.
Lily
6:17 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Magnet schools exist at the elementary level to act as feeder schools to the higher levels. One does not need to be gifted to get in. In fact that is the exact opposite of the purpose for the Magnet program. The special program in it's entirety exists for several reasons. One of which is to provide diversity by pulling student from the entire county instead of the localized highly segregated mini societies the county is made up of. It is also to act as a dynamic model to test teaching methods ets. It also offers student interested in particular subject a way of exploring those things even if they don't come from families with a lot of money. The county does not bus all kids to the schools they attend. Many parents drive their children to the magnet programs because they are not in the busing area of the school.
April
8:25 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
Children that get into magnet schools at the elementary level are not chosen for being "gifted"- it is a random lottery that decides who will attend. Also, many students do not get bussed in. I drive an hour to get my son to his magnet school everyday.
CC
8:53 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
As a correction to your mis-statement, student that are outside of the surrounding area of the school do not get bused in. Parents were made aware of this and were given the decision to enroll their child knowing they would have to drive them there. Like April, I made the decision and sacrifice to drive my child. However, this was under the BCPS guarantee that my younger child will get in. If this rule is not revised, I may have to either pull my child out of the magnet program due to distance, or figure out a way to get both my children to school and picked up from school in two different areas. Having them in the same school will alleviate this issue.
Concerned Citizen
1:17 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
It's a magnet school that you can only get in through a lottery. So, if you are lucky and win the lottery once, then all of your children are grandfathered in? That is absolutely absurd. Mr. Irwin is simply looking out for his other children that might actually have to attend a regular county school, God forbid.
Karl
2:09 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
If it's absurd, grandfather in magnet school siblings and then change the rules so everyone will know the new policy going in effect two years from now. Oops! I'm not on a board appointed committee. Don't listen.
Lily
6:23 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
It's not absurd when you consider that the success of the magnet program depends on students ability to finish the whole course of study. It also depends on families being able to completely commit themselves to volunteering and the success of the school. If families have to split their resources between two schools then the school will suffer. If students get pulled out midstream because their sibling didn't get in and parents couldn't mitigate the logistical problems of having students in separate schools then you would end up with a failed program. Some of the courses of study are specific enough that a child entering halfway through might not do well and so the program would be almost 1/3 capacity by graduation. It's better for the program as a whole to let the siblings in. It's better for the current students to let the siblings in. Who should have more priority, current students, families, and the program or theoretical stakeholders who have spent no time at all supporting the program and won't unless their kid gets in.
April
8:22 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
I was very happy to see there is now a petition to repeal this decision. I drive an hour to get my child to school because, like so many others, we do not live in an area that provides bus service. If my daughter will not be allowed in through sibling priorty placement, there is no way my son will be able to continue in the program. This will be especially hard on single parents and those that live far away like we do.
bills
3:10 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Thanks for sharing this Tom. I am a parent of a CVE student and was wondering why I wasn't alerted of this change in policy... so I double checked my email and found it attached to a message about a volunteer brunch event! as a document named "dear parents"! Seems like a sneaky way to get the word out. I had already deleted it because I was not planning to attend the brunch!
It's absurd that BCPS would change this policy and not involve the parents and the school community. If nothing else, they should at least allow families already in the school to be grandfathered in.
Amy: should do more research on young learners and get a better understanding of what a magnet school and its purpose is, before commenting. And if the crowded Towson schools was a concern of BCPS, you should know that the announcement also noted they will no longer automatically accept students from within the historic walking boundaries. All students accepted after 14/15 will be lottery-based.
Disgusted: should call Tom personally to work these issues out or call a psychiatrist.
Amy
5:09 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Parents who feel that their other children should be able to go to the magnet school simply because their older sibling is there are invalidating the purpose of the magnet program. Why would parents of the children who want to be there put up with students who are just there because their siblings are there?
Concerned Citizen
3:15 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
It's absurd that everyone is not subject to same rules.... My slightly under achieving child will keep your exceptional child out of a magnet school simply because his brother is already in..... Like I said ABSURD.... If you want your children parochial schooled, then go pay for it champ
Concerned Citizen
3:36 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Too funny how the only responders are those who obviously have more than one child with one in a magnet school. You are getting a benefit that others aren't offered, like I said before your sense of entitlement is quite disturbing
Lily
7:06 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Everyone entering a magnet program is getting a benefit others are not afforded. The magnet program does not benefit just the students attending. It also benefits the other schools in the county. It does this by providing a model for the other schools to follow. You all need to find do some reading on the benefits of magnet programs to a whole dynamic school system and stop thinking about this from the stand point of how it benefits just one kid or another. If that where the only reason for a magnet program then there would be no justification for it. Magnet programs provide diversity of education. It's unfortunate however that the program isn't large enough to handle everyone who wants to be in it. Maybe it should be expanded.
April
8:30 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
What is disturbing is your obvious hostility to a situation that you don't seem to have much experience with. I bet you would have a different tone if your child were in one of these schools.
Lily
1:07 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
My "obvious hostility" is only my quite natural reaction to an attitude which doesn't seem to be able to understand that attending Towson schools is a privilege in and of itself. It's a privilege that I would be happy to have even if my child had to take some classes in a trailer. I'll tell you what how about if your child trades places with a child at halstead. Then your child won't have to be in a trailer and the halstead child I'm sure won't complain at all about being crowded at Towson. I'm just amazed that there is such a lack of appreciation for what you already have that you're going to hate on a program because you don't have their buildings at your disposal. You don't really care about the sibling rule at all, it's just being used as a way to undermine the whole program because you want it gone so you can have those two buildings. What's more you have no shame about this elitism.
Susana Barrios
4:21 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Dear Discusted, for the record, my children attend a magnet school because it is also their zoned school, my older daughter has a learing disability and my younger daughter is in the gifted program, my oldest daughter has no interest in going to a magnet middle school, while my younger one does. You are making this personal, we all may or may not agree with you, the point is that policies are being changed without notice to parents and with out giving us the opportunity to give our input, you have very valid points, but you sound angry at just Mr. Irwin, it makes people not want to listen to you. Have a nice day
Concerned Citizen
9:27 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012
Susana, nothing against Irwin. Bottom line is if you need to win a lottery to get into school , it should be that way for all outside of that zone. Not just, hey my child got lucky so my six other kids get to ride his coattails
Lily
7:13 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
six... not many people have six kids. Besides you are forgetting something. That family with three kids that will all get in with have a sustained interest in the school and it's success. I know people personally who spend so much time volunteering at their magnet school that it could easily be deemed thier part time job. One woman in particular I see every time I enter the building. In fact my kindergarten daughter already knows her name. There is no arbitrary riding of coat tails here. The parents help make the school what it is and families that are fully invested instead of only half invested is a very desirable thing for the program.
So let me see if I understand you. You would rather create instability to increase the chance that your kid might, and that's a very big might get in and run the risk that the program suffers than accept the fact that we all play the lottery. It's fair because everyone knows going in what the rules are. But now you want to change the rules, midstream I might add for a lot of families. I strongly suspect that the same people making the argument against the sibling rule would quite quickly be arguing for it once their children are in the program and they don't want to pull them or attend events at different schools etc. Keeping siblings together is such an obvious asset that I'm amazed it's even up for debate except for some folks sour grapes.
Debbie Gill
12:55 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
As a parent of a child with no younger siblings, I am not affected in any way by this decision. I do, however, understand that parents would want all of their children to have the same exceptional experience at the same school regardless of the level (elem, middle, or high school). There is more to it than just wanting the convenience of only having to take your elementary aged kids to the same school. You get to know and like the teachers. The teachers find it easier to work with families they know well!! As a parent that will serve a second year on the PTA Executive Board, I am fully aware of MANY parents that NEVER pitch in for anything, whether with time or money. Since Tom has stepped up and has been elected as next year's President, it makes sense that he would want to represent all of his kids. Parents have enough trouble trying to juggle work and family so why make it harder on them? They are more likely to be involved if it isn't confusing trying to coordinate events at multiple schools! Any teacher will tell you that they wished there were more parents involved! I haven't even mentioned the fact that this was decided without any parent involvement because it it so absurd that that has happened!! I have to laugh at the absolute absurd and immature comments from "Disgusted". You are coming across as very disgruntled and are using this forum for a personal attack on Tom. Go to Happy Hour and chill out!!!!!
Amy
9:15 am on Friday, May 25, 2012
Everyone keeps saying that the issue is that the County didn't involve the parents in their decision, but let's face it, if you agreed with the decision, you wouldn't care that you weren't involved. Right or wrong, the County makes decisions every day without input from parents. I have elementary aged children myself, so I understand the desire to provide them with the best education possible, However, the fact that children who live within walking distance of the school may not be able to attend it because children from other school districts won a lottery is just wrong! Tax payers should be outraged by that!
I know a family whose special needs child was enrolled at another bcps elementary school (which happens to be magnet & home school) who had to sell their house and move into that school district in order for their younger child attend the same school. As wrong as I think that is, why do you think that you deserve a special privilege that no one else in the county is entitled to?
Lily
7:22 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
The should not have had to sell their house. Most likely they were not aware of the fact that they should have qualified for a special transfer. There is a rule that if a child gets a special transfer for any reason their siblings are also entitled to one. It's sounds like there is more to that situation that what you've presented.
You're misrepresenting the program. Zoned kids don't get bumped by magnet placements. At least not until the historic walking zone priority placement to CVE was repealed along with the sibling priority placement. Now I guess those walkers who don't get in by the lottery will end up in already over crowded Towson schools.
April
8:40 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
Children within the school district should be allowed in without a lottery process. This is currently the case, and is another mistake this rule change is making. Towson schools are overcrowed, but that is not just the fault of the magnet system. Real estate developement in Towson over the past few years is booming because more people want to send their children to those schools. I think the overcrowding issue is bound to get worse as more people move into the area. This rule change will may litlle to no impact on that situation.
Michael Middleton
1:41 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
There is a lot of confusion and misunderstanding here. The important piece is that this isn't over unless you want it to be. I can see a concerted effort by the affected school's PTAs, with a big push from the individual parents against the board with discussion also directed to Kamenentz (it is his board after all) to get things changed. People are going to have to be motivated however. The board (possibly correctly) did not feel they needed public input on this issue, and expect some negative feedback. Let's give it to them.
Amy/Disgusted - Debbie, Bart, and Bills have it right. Personally I also think that the reason magnet schools do better is due to higher parental involvement. For elementary, there is no "testing" that goes on prior to acceptance, and you don't get thrown out for poor performance. I knew people in our "home school" who couldn't even be bothered to fill out the application. While the magnet program exists, having siblings in different schools presents a burden on families that try to do more than just send their kids to school.
Disgusted - Tom has his share of admirers and detractors. We support him because in doing so we support our children, which is the end goal, and I appreciate his efforts in highlighting this change.
Robert Hoornbacher
4:43 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
I could care less about Cromwell being a magnet school; in fact I wish it wasn’t. I live across the street from the school with one daughter already attending, the fact that the School Board is telling me that my other two daughters may not be able to go there is absurd. Where we live we should be automatic no ifs and or buts about it. It will be interesting to see but one of the things that makes Cromwell So good is the parent involvement --- funny the most active parents are from the neighborhood and not that of children being bused in from all over the county. The fact the families had no input in this is BS ..
Disgusted - I’m assuming your kids were not accepted - Sorry about your luck, for you to make personal attacks against Tom is pathetic, he is representing the interest of the parents who have children in the school
Next time have some Balls - and sign your name
MY NAME IS ROBERT HORNBACHER
PTAmom
11:50 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012
Central district schools are overcrowded. CVE and Lutherville Lab should be turned back into neighborhood schools ASAP.
Lily
7:32 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Those schools are overcrowded because a whole ton of people who couldn't be bothered moving into underpopulated areas and improving the schools there decided instead to move into an over populated area without a thought toward sustainability and then ironically complain when the public resources such as schools can't respond fast enough for the vast influx of people overwhelming the system. How ironic that people are moving to an area because they feel entitled to whatever the area has to offer and then they want to take something that benefits the whole county for themselves because they feel crowded. This is abject selfishness. Why can't you all find a why to solve your crowding problem without taking something that isn't yours to take? The magnet program is for the whole county, it should not be taken from the whole county to serve one small area.
Here's an idea how about if we give CVE and Lutherville to Towson. Then lets build two mamoth state of the art schools for the magnet program that double the capacity of those two schools. Then we can keep the sibling rule and make PTAmom happy. Oh wait... we already are building two new state of the art schools and they went to Towson... so much for that idea.
Robert Hoornbacher
6:13 pm on Saturday, May 26, 2012
PTAmom.... You are absolutly correct ... And all this is going to do is over burden Hampton Elemenrty , Stonleigh and Rogers Forge even more because parent are not goin to split their children up...not to mention the added cost of extra busses and the loss of neighborhood support to CVE
PTAmom
10:59 pm on Saturday, May 26, 2012
Years ago, because student population was low and to keep the buildings viable for bcps, CVE and Lutherville Lab were made into magnet schools. Now, the schools are needed by the immediate community. Our elected (and appointed) officials must find the back bone and say to out-of-district CVE families, "Go back to your home schools" Allow the current CVE students to age out. DO allow central district kids to enroll, regardless of grade level. Common sense.
Karl
11:05 am on Sunday, May 27, 2012
Thumbs up. I wasn't aware of the history. It makes perfect sense. I particularly like the grandfathering, which was part of my plan. Evolution is superior to revolution.
Tnx
Bart
12:11 pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012
Oh, PTAmom, you are so right. When my kids attended Lutherville Lab in 1993 when it reopened, it was made a Magnet because the "Neighborhood" population wasn't large enough. Within 2 years, "resource teachers" were working out of broom closets and on carts because Baltimore county failed to pay attention to all the homebuilding going on in the West Seminary area......and, now HOW MANY transportables are there? It's shameful.
Don't get me wrong, it was a wonderful learning experience for them, but the overall planning left a lot to be desired.
They, as an organization, are so shortsighted.
Amy
8:53 am on Tuesday, May 29, 2012
If you read the article, it says that this new rule will not go into effect until the 2015-2016 school year. The County has given more than 3 years for everyone to plan accordingly.
Concerned Citizen
1:32 pm on Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Robert, you frighten me.
Bill
3:38 pm on Tuesday, May 29, 2012
The regulation change does three things: 1) eliminates priority for community kids; 2) eliminates (eventually) sibling priority placement; and 3) preserves the rights of teachers to keep their kids in their magnet school (with no time restriction). I would like to organize an effort to persuade our elected and appointed officials to review this in the open and deal with the issue in a forthright manner. If anyone is looking to join, please email your contact information to bblack771@gmail.com.
Thanks,
Bill
Lily
7:37 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
I've started a facebook group for just that purpose http://www.facebook.com/groups/siblingrule/
Robert Hoornbacher
4:20 pm on Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Disgusted
I frighten you? … Why because I have an opinion that differs from you. You made several posts attacking an individual; you then went on to refer to the parents of CVE children as entitled. Which is fine you are entitled to your own opinion however, have a little courage when making those posts, I imagine if you weren’t embarrassed about your own comments you would have posted your name. It is obscured for me to think 2 of my girls can’t go to school together. It is absurd to think my girls would get bussed out of their neighborhood and have to go to another school. There is a lot more to this issue than just neighborhood kids.. Baltimore County should be ashamed for not allowing parental involvement on this issue.
Bill - Councilman David Marks is the elected representative for the district, I have found him very easy to work with, and he represents the area well. I have already voiced my concerns to him and have a meeting coming up with him on an unrelated subject – but will voice my concerns about the current issue while I have his ear. I would encourage people to contact him and let them know how they feel Especially if they are Campus Hills Residence
Karl
8:40 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Thank you Bill. I didn't realize that teachers's children were not included in these new rules. That in itself recognizes the validity of parents' and every one else's objections.
What a farce.
Lily
10:39 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Special transfer students sibling rule is not being repealed either.
Karl
8:42 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012
PS,
Tell Bill Frank and Susan Auman too. They have been very supportive of a change to an elected School board
Amy
9:28 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012
There are 107 elementary schools in Baltimore county. Only 7 of them have magnet programs. That is 6%. Even if you replaced the entire school board, they still have to think about the other 94%.
This sense that the County somehow owes you something on top of providing (for free) an enriched learning experience for at least one of your children is the very definition of entitlement.
Unless you have quadruplets, ALL families with more than one child will be faced with them going to different schools at one time or another simply based on their different ages. I have a friend who has two children at a County Elementary school and one at the Maryland School for the Blind on the other side of town, but I never hear her complaining! If you had a child that was a music prodigy and was admitted to the Baltimore School for the Arts, would you not send them there because your other children can't go? It's a ridiculous, selfish argument!
Please try to appreciate the opportunity that you have been given, instead of complaining about not getting more.
CC
9:12 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
For many parents I don't think it is a sense of entitlement. This was a guarantee by BCPS and they have since gone against that. I'm sure many parents will make whatever sacrifices and changes they need to make to get their children will they need to. However, this is about what was promised to parents. If they want to get rid of sibling priority fine, but any students that are currently enrolled should be grandfathered in.
Amy
9:40 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
So CC, as long as you're taken care of than you're okay with the rule change?
CC
12:00 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
Amy, I'm not looking to get into a debate with or any other parent regarding this topic. My issue is not with you. It's not a matter of me being taken care. It is matter of what BCPS promised when I enrolled my child in the magnet program and them upholding that promise to not only ME & MY CHILD but all of the parents that enrolled their children in the program. If they want to make that change for incoming students, that is fine, but they should not change it for students that are currently enrolled in the program. Families have made life changes and decisions based on this and not everyone has the means to pick up and move, or shuffle their kids all over the county, but I guess that is their problem too.
Robert Hoornbacher
2:33 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Different schools when the children are in different school like elementry vs middle is one thing ...to have multiple children in multiple elementry schools is ludacris . The teacher should also be held to the same standard ...if this is a done decision then their children should have to apply like all the rest ......simple solution the central elementry schools are already overcrowded ...get rid of the magnet program
Robert Hoornbacher
2:36 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Amy ... I see your analogies and those are specific issue that make sence ... I have 2 normal kids that will be one grade apart ...thee is no reason why they should be bussed out of my neighborhood to go to an overcrowded school up the road when I have one right across the street ....
Amy
4:21 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012
I agree with you. CVE should be a home school. I don't believe in the magnet program at the elementary level anyway. Especially since it isn't even merit or need based. The magnet program might be beneficial to the students enrolled, but no one considers the negative impact that an exclusive magnet school can have on the adjacent community.
The rule doesn't specifically address what will happen with the students who live within the walking boundaries. What happens with them now, and do you know for sure that it will change?
PTAmom
10:55 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Just wondering if anyone knows this...how many students attending Hampton Elementary live in Campus Hills?
Robert Hoornbacher
7:27 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
That's a good question ....I know of at least 8 ... But I'm sure there is more ...the question should be how many kids are contributing the the overcrowding of Hampton because Cromwell is not a "neighborhood" school. Most of the kids that live in the upper providence road corridor go to happen .... Where Cromwell used to be there home school.
Susana Barrios
11:13 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012
I have to say, reading your comments has been very educational, there are many things happening and I was not aware of them. I have one question. Why are some schools better than others? It seems to me that if some schools are doing it right, how hard is it to make it work in other schools? All schools have the potential of being great schools, I'm new to Baltimore County Schools, so I am learning my way around here.
Lily
4:39 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Magnet schools have the ability to discharge any children who are failing from the school so that they are no longer part of the magnet program. Other schools can't do that.
Robert Hoornbacher
6:14 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Lilly
all though Magnet schools at the High School level have the ability to discharge any children who are failing the "school Magnet Portion" from the school so that they are no longer part of the magnet program. This DOES NOT APPLY AT THE ELEMENTRY SCHOOL LEVEL
Lily
4:37 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012
I've started a facebook group opposing the repeal of the sibling priority placement rule. http://www.facebook.com/groups/401388689904217/
I've also stated here all of my reasons for opposing it
http://www.facebook.com/notes/lily-parascheva-rowe/sibling-priority-placement-rule-for-baltimore-country-elementary-magnet-school-p/10151000897606163
Robert Hoornbacher
6:11 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Lily,
The the fact that the neighborhood children and their siblings wil no longer be able to attend accept through the lotter - affect the neighbords that border CVE - and Lutherville - with those children no longer gaining automatic admitance they will have to attend the already overcrowded shcools like Hampton and Dumbarton
Robert Hoornbacher
6:43 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Lily,
I think the sibling rule should exist - it directly impacts my children - However I also believe that the "neighborhood Policy" should also remain in effect. The neighborhoods children "walkers" do not take up that many spots when they start at K. I agree with a lot of what you are saying but - Elementary schools do not have the arbitrary power the throw a kid out because he/she fails. The additional overcrowding will become an issue when neighborhood students are not guaranteed admittance - so we will see in the next few years
Lily
7:51 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Robert,
I wasn't aware of that. I was simply going by what the "rules" actually say. They do not specify that only the secondary schools can remove children from the programs.
I agree with you on the neighborhood policy as well now that I see what the issue is.
This whole thing is so crazy. Really it just seems to me like someone wants to undermine the stability of the magnet program in order to set the stage for it's total removal.
I predict redistricting. Then we'll really see some protesting because people are still moving to Towson and the there is no where else to build schools. Has anyone even asked why Towson? Why does everyone want to be there? The answer is because it's one of the few places in the country that has not just sufficient schools but exceptional schools and on top of that you can get these exceptional schools at all three levels without moving. I'm hard pressed to find anywhere I could afford to live where I'd be in line for my children to attend an exceptional elementary, middle and high school in the same zone all being bused. If people spread out more and where not intent on living on top of one another for the sake of the schools maybe the other schools in the county would improve. But no one wants to do that work. They want to go to something already established All of you who bought a house in Towson in the last 7 years have created the problem you are complaining about
Lily
7:54 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
I really want to know why after all these years of having a sibling rule so well established that no one questioned that all of a sudden they want to repeal it. I want to hear them actually articulate a response.
PTAmom
8:53 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
There is no reason to have magnet elementary schools. None. CVE was created at a time when technology was just being introduced to the community at large.
If just CVE was turned back into neighborhood school, would an addition to Hampton have been necessary? CVE has a capacity of 400 students. 400!
What's the Hampton addition?
How many schools could have been air conditioned with that money?
I live in the northeast area and I am very involved with our children's schools--especially the elementary school level. If your neighborhood school is not what you want it to be, get involved! If you have children going to middle or high school in a few years and you don't like what your hearing, get involved with those schools NOW!
Attend the Area Educational Advisory meetings, volunteer to be on SIT meetings at schools your children will attend in the future. Get involve now to make a change!
Just recently, our oldest child went to one of the best magnet high schools in the county. After 2 years of hearing teachers cuss out their students, dealing with arrogant attitudes from administration about Blue Ribbon status, PSAT scores, this high achieving child came to us and said 'enough'. We were hesitant to consider the local high school. Guess what? It has been wonderful! Instead of taking a bus for 45 minutes at 6:50am, it takes me 3 minutes to drop off/pick up. This child is taking the same caliber of classes, if not higher. Life is good.
carey
10:03 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
Just one parent getting involved is not enough. That's what makes magnet schools so great- high levels of parent involvement.
If you want to take over a school- take Loch Raven Elementary- that school is not even being used. I bet you wouldn't want you're kids going there! Talk about a "sense of self-entitlement". I am so glad my kid did not get into magnet school when I applied.
I think the county should deal with overcrowding by creating a mandatory exchange program. Students who ride the bus in overcrowded schools will have to alternate attendance at other county schools. That would be a true practice in diversity. Although, I'm not sure if I would want your snobby kids influencing mine.
Robert Hoornbacher
9:03 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
PTAmom
we are getting involved !! a whole lot of us actually.... so we can make sure Sibling Priority Stays in place - We are involved, and are happy with out Childrens School - I am happy you are so happy about your neighborhood school ..... If you live in North East , and your Children dont lgo to CVE - how does this affect you
I graduated from Towson High ...one of the oldest high schools in the county ...we did not have A/C and we all recieved a fantastic education ... I would rather that money be spent on adding educational opertunites or programs for the children .
PTAmom
9:12 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Robert,
CVE should be a neighborhood school, not a magnet school.
It effects ME, because I pay taxes. With my tax money, additions are added to Towson schools because of overcrowding. Yes, Towson, we all pay taxes.
CVE has seats for 400 Towson students. Hampton's addition is unnecessary.
Lily
10:56 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
How funny that you think your tax money should only be used in Towson. You know what I pay taxes too and I don't live in Towson but I wonder how much money from the whole rest of the county will be used to build more schools for Towson or when they redistrict me and I end up in the halstead distric intead of Pleasant Plains how much will anyone care because right now know one cares.
I don't think people really understand the scope of the over population problem in the Towson area. Two schools isn't going to even begin to be enough for the projected overcrowding. It's going to be completely insane. I don't think Towson has enough tax money to pay for all the new buildings and renovations they are going to need and yet you want to actually say that the county wide magnet program is the problem. The problem is you. The problem is over population. Everyone can't live in the same place and you don't get to take over established institutions just because you can bully your way through a legislative system. People in the rest of the county matter too not just the people in Towson and our schools are not going to get what they need because the state is going to mandate the county to fix Towson's overcrowding issues. So don't tell me about fair and paying taxes.
Amy
10:01 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
Lily-
Your comment that PTA Mom thinks that her tax money should only be used in Towson is completely ignorant. Did you even read what she said? She was actually complaining about the tax money that has been spent on possibly unnecessary additions.
Lily
2:01 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
Yeah I understand it. My point is that it's a matter of perspective if you think the renovation money is unnecessary.
Micro perspective: That CVE is close to Towson and the money spent on Hampton is unnecessary.
Macro perspective: That CVE provides a value to the magnet program and the magnet program provides a value to the county education system as a whole that makes the expense of expanding Hampton worth it.
My point about taxes was an observation that I've made is that when people have this attitude about their taxes they quickly forget the Macro view and start to think in only Micro terms. Baltimore county school system is a Macro system not a Micro one and that is why Towson has no legitimate right to the property of CVE or Lutherville regardless of it's geographical proximity to Towson.
However I've notice that because of the activism necessary to deal with overcrowding and the politics that where unfortunately necessary to get it done that people are becoming divided along micro lines into factions.
If we really wanted to play this smart we could all get what we want here but as long as we are being devided into factions then we all look unreasonable.
Really what we should be going after is the stop overcrowding group should help the magnet keep it's sibling rules and the sibliing rules group should help lobby for building and renovation. Then both groups could fight for a hybrid elected appointed board...
Lily
2:01 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
or we could just rip each out apart in the streets... until people are afraid to let us vote anyone in for fear Towson will take over the elections process. If we want the right to vote we need to show the county legislature that we would know how to manage equitably. It doesn't have to be a zero sum game.
Amy
10:10 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
I ABSOLUTELY agree with PTA mom!!!!!! And I think that once you start this fight, you will find that the rest of the county does too! Robert- Doesn't it bother you that the automatic acceptance of siblings is precisely the reason why your children may not be able to attend the school across the street from your home?
Students who live closer to CVE are being bused to Hampton where, like many other central area schools, there are several trailers. I don't see any trailers at CVE. It needs to reopen as a home school. The magnet program is a luxury that the County cannot afford right now!
Robert Hoornbacher
10:21 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
Like most of you to me it is a personal issue .... I am in the "Walking Boundary" I have one child that attends there now and another that will in 2 years as a "Guaranteed” Sibling before the standard changes ....however then my 3rd child who would be entering the next years is not guaranteed. I simply do not want to have two children in 2 elementary school. So personally I’m ok with it going back to a neighborhood school ... however I don’t think that will happen - funding for theses schools does not necessarily come from where you think it would and Baltimore county is not going to give up that money ....if they give up Elementary School magnet programs they lose that money ....there is a lot more going on I think than we all know ....I am very disappointed in the way Baltimore County went about doing this - they have violated some of their own policies .
It boils down to money - and bottom line is it won’t get re-allocated to other schools even thought it should so I don’t see the magnet program changing
I’m concerned about my Kids - and I want them to go to school together - That’s it nothing more nothing less and I think most parents can respect that .
Amy
10:41 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
I think almost everyone posting here agrees with you about your situation, but I just think that you're fighting for the wrong thing. It's not about the money that is going into the magnet school- it's about the unnecessary overcrowding that this one particular magnet school has created at Hampton. CVE should be turned back into a home school. Your neighborhood and the surrounding community deserve to have that.
Robert Hoornbacher
10:43 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012
I don't disagree ....
PTAmom
7:06 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
Lily,
You need to read comments thoroughly before commenting.
Towson population is no different than it was 35 years ago. Campus Hills and West Towson area, etc... were filled with children. After the kids grew up, the county closed schools, turned under-used schools into senior centers, rec centers, , schools dedicated for special needs kids, or magnet schools. The same number of seats have been anticipated for years. The County didn't plan it out.
In reference to your comment about Halstaed: for the same reason a Towson parent may move because of overcrowding, if you don't want to make your neighborhood school better--MOVE.
Lily
2:06 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
I think most people would agree that wealthier people are in a better position to move than people who are not. Not everyone has the options you so obviously take for granted.
CC
8:46 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
If you are against the sibling priority change, sign the petition:
https://www.change.org/petitions/baltimore-county-public-schools-revise-rule-6400-for-sibling-priority-placement-2?utm_medium=email&utm_source=share_petition#
Amy
9:10 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
Lily,
My father graduated from Towson High School in 1961 with over 700 students in his class. I graduated almost 30 years later with approx. 320 students in my class. In the early 70's there were something like 700 students at Riderwood Elementary (before any addition), yet by 1979 the County had to close nearby Ruxton Elementary (now the Ridge School and West Towson) due to a drastic DROP in population. The population of Every community will fluctuate over time and the County has to have more flexibility with it's schools in order to accommodate the fluctuation. You preach as though you are an expert on population, but you don't seem to know much about the population in Towson. For the record, there has been very little new construction in Towson (keep in mind that Towson is only 2 zip codes- 21204 & 21286) in the last 20 years. I can only think of 2 new neighborhoods that were built off of Old Court Road in Ruxton, one of which is only a few homes. This overcrowding affects the entire CENTRAL AREA, and the way it is handled will affect the whole County.
Lily
2:33 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
The population in Towson has increased 14% since 1990 and 9% since 2000. That's 7,890 people since 1990 more than half of which has been in the last ten years. What that means is that in that last ten years the population has increased significantly more than it increased in the prior ten years. It has certainly not "stayed the same" as it was 30 years ago. I suspect it is also increasing as we speak.
http://www.americantowns.com/md/towson/info/population
Lily
2:45 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
There are also about 1700 vacant dwellings in Towson so there's room for even more people. What you all should be doing is lobbying the zoning authority that regulates builders to deny any new building in Towson until the school capacity is large enough to handle it... other counties in the state do it. I've said it before and I'll say it again. This is a "sustainability" issue not a "fairness in the magnet admissions process" issue.
http://www.americantowns.com/md/towson/info/housing
Lily
2:56 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
Parkville by comparison has decreased in population by 2% since 1990 steadily at the same rate:
http://www.americantowns.com/md/parkville/info/population
For a neighboring town to have such a difference it begs a few questions about why. The answer is school quality.
April
10:22 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
Two new neighborhoods? Are you not counting the numerous apartments and condo's that have been built in the last five years? Here are a few: The Quarter, Somerset at Towson, The Palisades, Fairways at Towson, Towson Promenade. I am sure there are more. There hasn't been much new home construction because not everyone can afford to buy a house in Towson, but thanks to these places a lot more people can afford to live there. The reason your schools are overcrowded is not because of the magnet program, it is because people want to live in your neighborhood and send their children to your schools. If you have a problem with overcrowing maybe you should move or send your children to private school. That is what you are suggesting that the rest of us do, right?
Amy
2:01 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
Actually, I had forgotten about those new buildings. Probably because I doubt there are more than a few (if any) families with small children living there. They are not exactly low income housing. But now that you mention it, I did know a family who lived there temporarily when they moved to the area. The kids went to Hampton.
I never suggested that anyone move. But if the involved parents that send their kids to magnet schools focused all their energy on their home schools then I think they can make them as excellent as any other school. Parent involvement is the reason that the Central Area schools are so good. And I think ALL children deserve to go to a school that is not overcrowded.
Lily
2:11 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
...or have a little patience that it takes time to build buildings and make renovations and that it will eventually all get worked out and we don't need to attack the magnet program via the priority placement rules in order for that to happen.
If you all knew this was coming down the pike so long ago why did you wait to politically organize until your kids where in school. It seems to me that you're community dropped the ball here in a way that has nothing to do with the magnet program but you want to take something that doesn't belong to you as a quick fix because building takes a little time.
April
2:54 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
There are more than just a handful of people that have children in those new developements. I drive through there often and see many children entering/ exiting school busses at those buildings.
As I am sure you are well aware, and as I read in another post, it takes more than one or two involved parents to change the quality of a school.
You are right about all children deserving to go to a school that is not overcrowded, but that is a issue you have with the people responsible for zoning changes that allowed so much population growth in such a short time due to new developement in your area.
Even with sibling priority removed it will not help your situation. If anything, your argument against magnet schools could actually read as an argument for more magnet schools. The program obviously works because the schools are doing very well. They also do away with overcrowding issues by limiting the number of students that can be enrolled. Furthermore, magnet schools allow parents and teachers that want to be involved to do so along with many others like them. If there were more magnet schools to choose from across the county, there would not be so many people applying to the same area. This means more people get to choose their childs school if they want to put in the extra effort and less impact on neighborhoods that offer magnet programs. If there were more magnet schools created than there would be more room at those schools for children that live in those districts.
Lily
3:12 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
April that's brilliant! Let's do that! Let's expand the magnet program! We can solve overcrowding and provide for diversity at the same time and let's keep the priority placement rules for siblings and walkers at the same time! Everyone would be happy. Think of it... no more magnet wait lists. Everyone who wants to go can.
PTAmom
3:18 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
Lily,
CVE should be turned back to a neighborhood school. It served its purpose and now it's time for it to be given back to its immediate community.
Lily
3:26 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
You sound like a parrot. Other than that statement can you back up your opinion with anything remotely like a reason that is based on anything besides your geographical elitism and sense that anything within your reach should be yours? What you are suggesting is never going to happen.
April
4:10 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
Expanding the magnet program seems to be a logical conclusion based on how successful it has been. Fighting over "who" Cromwell belongs to really sounds like a preschool student throwing a tantrum because the barbies in the toy bin belong to her. Magnet schools are community property because all of Baltimore County is paying for them.
Lily
4:28 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
... it's worse than that. She doesn't want the "barbies" she wants the "bin" unfortunately the "bin" just so happens to be bolted to the floor of a house that doesn't belong to her. We're even building her new "bins" but she doesn't want to wait for construction. She would rather just take someone else's "bin" and throw away the "barbies" that actually belong to many different people as well. Unfortunately she doesn't understand that this "bin" is actually a complex network of "bins" which provide more than just "barbies" and undermining this "bin" would undermine the whole network. Patience is a virtue my dear.
Actually though at this point I think she just want's to win the argument. Having lost through reason she hopes to win through stomping because we've provided for her every objection and she's completely unreasonable. I submit that even if there where no overcrowding she would still object to CVE and the magnet program because some people just don't really like diversity all that much, particularly if it's in their own backyard.
Amy
5:39 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012
PTA Mom-
Reason doesn't work with everyone. I agree with you and I'm sure that the vast majority of the County does too. I think our work here is done, since the discussion has been reduced to nonsense.
Tyler Waldman
2:33 pm on Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Hey everyone,
We just posted a follow-up on this issue: http://towson.patch.com/articles/marks-asks-school-system-to-revisit-magnet-rule-change