patching...
Breaking: Longshot Oxbow Wins Preakness Stakes »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
Insider Politics

Jim Smith Comes Out For Question 7

Former Baltimore County Executive Jim Smith has joined the list of current and former elected officials to throw support behind the referendum to expand gambling in Maryland.

Smith appears in the latest (but it's hard to keep track) commercial in favor of Question 7.

Smith can be seen standing in what appears to be an elementary school hallway with a primary color-painted mural backdrop endorsing the effort and asking for voters to join him in supporting the issue.

"Marylanders can keep spending millions at casinos in other states or we can generate millions for our schools right here," Smith says in the commercial. [See the commercial here.]

Opponents argue that the law, if passed, would not result in additional spending on education.

Other elected officials to appear in commercials for the referendum include Prince George's County Executive Rushern Baker and Gov. Martin O'Malley.

Smith was not immediately available to comment for this post.

Comment_arrow

Bart

4:35 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

Tim, you took my EXACT words!

M. Sullivan

2:35 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

Well, that will sure influence my vote !

Reply

Timika N Grant

2:54 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

Mr Smith right people going to delware and other place to gamble.We need that money right here in Maryland.We need better schools,jobs and other things

Reply

Joe

4:48 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

"Opponents argue that the law, if passed, would not result in additional spending on education."

It is what the law says. Not one EXTRA dime is going to school funding, only the source will change unless they change this law like they did the entire slot law AFTER the voters had their say.

Reply

Bart

5:06 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

The funding is no guarantee. The "tens of thousands of jobs" is no guarantee. The ONLY guarantee is that the casino fat cats get tax breaks.

It's a bad deal all the way around for the citizens of Maryland.

If Jim Smith told me the sky was blue, I would check out the window.

Reply

M. Sullivan

5:24 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

As long as MD casinos must abide by the ridiculous state rules regarding comps they won't be as good as out of state casinos. As long as they must pay some of the highest taxes of any other state, they will payout the lowest rate they can on the machines. This low payout will continue to drive business out of state, regardless of whether we get table games or not.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bart

5:29 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

Sullivan, I know nothing about the payouts at casinos, but your claim makes a LOT of sense.

Comment_arrow

Other Tim

6:42 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

That's where the tax break for casino owners comes in. The casino owners' share was so low, the payouts were terrible. The state had to increase their share to get them to come. Between low payouts, bad comps, being late to the game with table games, and way too late to the game with slots, Maryland will never catch the neighboring states. I forecast in the next couple of years a tax increase, blaming the need on lower than forecast slot revenues.

Stephen Gewirtz

7:29 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

If you believe the ad, Maryland currently takes in $180 million per year from the existing casinos but will take in $200 million more if Question 7 passes. In other words, income for the state from casinos will more than double.

That just doesn't sound right. If you believe that, I will be glad to give you a good price on a bridge over the East River from Manhattan to Brooklyn.

Also, we have no idea what effect an additional casino in P.G. County will have on the other casinos. The one in Perryville has asked to turn slot machines back to the state because it says it has lost business to Maryland Live in Anne Arundel County. The casino in Perryville was supposed to capture the business going to Delaware.

Question 7 is simply a bad deal for Maryland. I will be voting NO.

Reply

DJ Groove

1:48 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

Of course the table gaming in MD is bad for residents. More specifically - for West VA residents. They won't enjoy "our" revenue any longer. So make no mistake - vote no on Q7 !

Reply

Lois Bowers

2:05 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

All this talk about casino's bringing in more money for schools is rediculios. First of all very little of the money goes to education. It's the same thing they said about the lottery when it started, and our schools are no better off. The big thing here is that why should we have to depend on gambling to support our school system. Isn't that the governments job?

Reply
Comment_arrow

M. Sullivan

2:35 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

Um Lois, just where do you think the government gets money?

Comment_arrow

Stephen Gewirtz

2:56 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

When the lottery was first voted on, we were told that the revenue would support education. Then, the legislature voted to build 2 stadiums and to finance them with the lottery. If you buy a Megamillions ticket, notice that it says on the ticket that the revenue goes to support the Maryland Stadium Authority.

We have no reason to believe that the extra revenue from expanded gambling, if there actually is any extra revenue, will go to education. Vote NO on Question 7.

Comment_arrow

Lois Bowers

3:17 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

M.Sullivan- I understand that the government depends on many different areas to get money, but our education system should not have to depend on lottery and casinos to have good schools for our children. Many states have no such systems and have great schools. Where do all our taxes go to? I think our state government as well as federal government needs to get their priorities straight.

FIFA_archived

2:22 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

A simple question for all, why is Penn National, owner of the Charlestown, West Virginia casino, spending millions of dollars fighting expanded gambling in Maryland? Oh, they think gambling is bad for Marylanders so we can go to West Virginia to help them. Vote Yes on Question 7.

Reply

Stephen Gewirtz

2:50 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

Penn National also owns the casino in Perryville, as well as the one in Charleatown. And its casino in Charlestown does not want competition in the form of table games. But to get table games, we have to vote for a casino in National Harbor and for a lower take by the state. And look at how much is being spent on the pro Question 7 ads by MGM Entertainment. You know they will make a bundle from Question 7.

If the legislature wants let us vote on table games without National Harbor and without lowering the state's take from gambling, it can let us do so. But meanwhile, vote NO on Question 7..

Reply
Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

2:54 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

Using the word "casino" when talking about Charlestown and Perryville is a false equivalency. The only common is the word "casino". Perryville is a poor excuse for the word compared to Charlestown. I have visited both. I won't be back to Perryville as is.

DJ Groove

2:54 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

I'd rather have them built casinos and whatsnot instead of paying more state income taxes.

Reply

DJ Groove

3:26 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

@Lois Bowers - looks like you should address your frustration towards Teachers Unions. They ask for more and more money from the government (well, taxpayers, cause the govt gets the money from them), and the results are the same if not worse.

Reply

PMM49

4:13 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

Is there anyone else who thinks that Jim Smith is a poor choice for the pro-gambling folks? I don't think he is really that popular or influential and may represent more of a negative where many people are concerned.
Gambling is a scourge that preys on those who can least afford it. It is a sad day when our elected representatives sell this to us at the expense of more pain and suffering for those who lack the judgement to know that gambling is a losing proposition and dead end.

Reply
Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

5:36 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

So is smoking, alcohol, not flossing, most fast foods, sugary sodas, etc.

Frank/FIFA/Steve

5:42 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

"Hello All. My name is Steve and this is my first meeting of Multiple Account Users Annonymous. I am quite nervous so bear with me. Using multiple identities unfolded upon me like a waking dream during Easter of 1993. My brother who I shan't ever speak with again and I went to Aunt Winnies for the annual easter egg hunt. Being slight of form and quite infirm for my age my robust and hardy brother quickly took the lion's share of the eggs. Boasting rapaciously he would not shut up about his tally in the least. I sulked. I fumed. Then I planned. Later that night I glided my slight form under his bed unbeknownst to him. As soon as I heard him snooze I made the most vile and wicked of all noises utilizing every monster movies I had ever watched. Soon to my delight he squealed in sheer terror and ran from the room. With the door barely hitting the jamb I raced to his closet and ripped open each and every golden plastic egg and hid its contents. When mom and dad arrived like sentinels in the fog I told them it was the monster under the bed that had swiped the candy. Then I came here. I tried, oh in vain how I tried to outsmart, outtech, outwit, outsize, outargue every fool on this blog. I could not do it. I resorted to my past. I created the names of Frank and FIFA and attacked everyone that outsmarted me. That is my confession." Next week is step 2. Penance. I will create a model cop car for Buzz Bueller and place it in his mailbox before Halloween. Caio Kittens

Reply

Frank/FIFA/Steve

5:45 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

For all my fans!!!!!!
All the other account name nics with the pumped up blogs
You better post, better post, outpost all my names
All the other posts with the trumped up stats
You better blog, better blog, faster than I can type

No pouting.

Reply

Buck Harmon

7:32 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

The fact that our State needs something as damaging as gambling to even begin to make a few ends meet is very telling of the quality of previous leadership. Our State has devolved to this very low point with perceived leaders like Jim Smith at the helm...such dummies..

Reply
Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

8:01 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

I presume you mean Ehrlich, the first proponent of casinos.

Leave a comment