McDonough calls Jacobs A 'Puppet' Candidate
Photos
Republican State Sen. Nancy Jacobs is expected to announce her candidacy for congress in Essex this morning but one Baltimore County delegate is less than impressed.
In fact, Del. Pat McDonough said he and some other Republicans won't likely vote for the four-term senator from Harford County. He also had a few choice words for another Republican, Rep. Andy Harris, who the delegate said is responsible for getting Jacobs to run and splitting Republican voters.
"We won't be supporting her," McDonough said on Wednesday. "We're waiting for another candidate."
Jacobs is expected to announce at 11 a.m. that she will seek the Republican nomination to challenge incumbent Democrat Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger in November.
McDonough did not elaborate on who else was not supporting Jacobs or who the identity of the candidate he believed would be announcing later.
McDonough said his primary problem with Jacobs is her support of a bill that grants in-state tuition to illegal immigrants during Gov. Robert Ehrlich's term in office.
Ehrlich ultimately vetoed the bill. Jacobs voted against the bill last year.
McDonough calls that waffling.
"We don't know if she goes to Washington which Nancy Jacobs will actually be in Congress," said McDonough, adding that there were other issues dividing him from Jacobs. He declined to immediately elaborate.
Not that McDonough thinks she can win. The delegate said Jacobs, in her state senate district, currently represents 11 percent of Ruppersberger's congressional district.
"The part of the district she represents she loses—I don't see that she has any base," said McDonough.
McDonough criticized Rep. Andy Harris, a freshman Republican, for lining up Jacobs to run.
"She's a puppet for Harris," McDonough said. "She wasn't even talking about running until he talked to her."
Larry Smith, a Timonium resident and member of Harris' congressional staff, is also running for the Republican nomination in the district Ruppersberger represents.
Contested primaries split Republican votes, said McDonough.
"(Harris) should pay attention to his own district," said McDonough.
Kathy Szeliga, a Republican delegate who represents the same district as McDonough and is Harris' campaign manager, said Harris "is no puppet master."
"Nancy Jacobs is a strong, independent Republican woman who makes her own decisions," said Szeliga.
Jacobs did meet with Harris as part of her exploratory process but Harris did not push her to run, said Szeliga.
"Andy is not out seeking candidates," she said.
Szeliga said she will personally endorse Jacobs once the senator formally announces her candidacy.
"She's tough on crime, she led the charge on Jessica's law, she's worked on gang issues and she was the first woman to become minority leader," Szeliga said.
As for Smith, Szeliga said "he's a great guy but he doesn't have the campaign or legislative experience Nancy Jacobs does—it isn't personal about Larry Smith."
Szeliga said Harris will likely "have a conversation" with Smith about his campaign but declined to say what that conversation might entail.
"Andy's not going to be someone who's putting candidates in or out," she said.
kevin
10:23 am on Thursday, January 5, 2012
Mcdonough is old news you can't take him seriously anymore. His grandstanding during the blizzards and Irene have cost him a majority of voters that didn't see how fanatcal he was
Tom Barnes
11:25 am on Thursday, January 5, 2012
McDonough, Jacobs and Harris are cut of the same political cloth: They find no room for middle ground, and this is EXACTLY what is wrong with politics both in Maryland and across the nation. The state of our Union is *not* built on black and white issues but rather grey area's. Not one of them are capable of helping middle America/the middle class because they can't see past their own grandiose ego's. All three need to go for our state to thrive both fiscally and socially.
Suffice it to say, there are 2 votes in my household. We can promise that none of these three "politicians" will ever receive a single vote for any office from either of us. Maryland can do better.
amdactivist
12:17 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012
Tom, Dutch has to go. A no vote is a plug and vote for the idiot.. The idiot that didn't read before he signed obamacare. The idiot that says you be nice to muslims and they be nice to you. The idiot that voted for Dream act and other horrors for illegal aliens..
Tom Barnes
7:42 am on Friday, January 6, 2012
Amdactivist - Every reason you just listed and claimed should be WHY we get rid of Dutch is WHY I will vote for him. As a (Gnostic) Christian, I believe that we take care EVERYONE, regardless of class or national origin. That means I firmly believe in universal health care. It means that we are taking care of everyone - "the least of these." Why is that wrong again? Oh yeah - because we don't want to take responsibility for mankind... just our own pocket books. That just doesn't make my soul feel real good.
Why is it idiotic to believe we should be nice to Muslims? When you are kind to people, they are kind to you - it's a no brainer. If you are trying to say that all Muslims are terrorists that doesn't make Dutch the idiot... it means you need to look in the mirror. I know quite a few Muslims and I know a lot about the Islamic faith. They are peaceful and kind. Islam is no more evil than Christianity. Let us be mindful of "christian" crusades, slaughtering indians in the name of Jesus, bombing abortion clinics, and those wonderful "christians" from Kansas who are so good at emotional terrorism. So, before you try and elude to Muslims bing "evil" let's get the log out of your own eye and that of the church.
As for the "dream act" and immigrants; Lev 19:34: "You shall treat the stranger who sojourns with you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.
Rob
9:49 am on Saturday, January 7, 2012
Tom the problem with people like you is, you only do things because they make you fell better about yourself. You never look at the results of your voting. You think your doing good by supporting universal health care because it makes you feel good about you, but the facts are universal health care is good for no one because it can not be maintained and sooner rather than later no one will have health care.
Why don't you think with your head for a change and do something because it's the smart thing to do and not because it makes you feel better about yourself?
Tom Barnes
9:21 pm on Saturday, January 7, 2012
Rob, that is the most moronic post on this entire thread. My concern is about human beings. You are most like Pro-Life as well, but you don't want to take care of the lives that are here now.
I don't care about how it makes me "feel" emotionally, cupcake. I care about what it does to my soul. Try it some time.
amdactivist
12:15 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012
all i know is that Dutch and Obama are like 2 thorns between the next rose. He has got to go. He voted for dream act which will cost md taxpayers Millions$ and is a friend of the muslim brotherhood that has 26k terrorist groups associated with them. He became washingtonized over night and his strings being pulled. I will vote for the one that is tough on illegals and not afraid to speak out. I will not vote for someone that is a hush hush politicians regarding illegal aliens. *criminals* who steal our $$, jobs and vote. They are allowed to work any dang place they want in md and most politicians cater to the employers who hire them.. Why? Campaign support. Employers pay well on the table and under.. How many people you know out of work while you see illegals working everywhere. Isn't $2billion a year Md tax $$ enough for them because of welfare, incarcerations, schooling, jobs etc?
Blythe N Chuck Strub
12:49 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012
I have to say Jacobs is one of the very few who was there to help us when we needed it. From what I have seen I am very impressed with her and what she has done in the Senate. We will support her 100% for her Congressional campaign even if we are not the "11%".
amdactivist
4:25 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012
she's very lien or non existant on immigration issues. Thats a major issue destroying our country and costing md taxpayers more then $2billion a year. Thats why omalley raising all permits, fines, fees, gas, tolls etc. to support his new americans. Nancy done some nice things while she was in office 17 years * i think* but like i said weak on immigration. I'd vote for her if she's all we have against the sellout washintonian Dutch.. Obama's puppet..
\
CB9678
1:43 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012
Now the clowns begin to fight!
amdactivist
4:26 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012
Thats very productive of you..
Josephine Hlatki
4:44 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012
I was at her press conference today, announcing her candidacy for congress and she sounded pretty hard on illegals today. Watch the local TV news today. 2, 11, 13 and FOX were there...so was Bryan Sears...he does a great job.
Skip727
6:12 am on Friday, January 6, 2012
As far as mcdonough goes...meh! My question is this: If Senator Jacobs is running who will represent her constituents in the GA? How can she effectively run a campaign AND do her job as the elected representative in the GA? Just asking.
amdactivist
6:41 am on Friday, January 6, 2012
They all do it and it is wrong.. We pay them to work for the citizens , not campaign for many months.. Most use mailings with our tax $$..
amdactivist
8:50 am on Friday, January 6, 2012
Tom, at one time I also fell into the trap as a 30 year plus democrat. I now research every single person I plan on voting for. Dutch's record is obnoxious. I am also an immigrant family coming to ellis island. this is not about supporting and helping immigrants. Its about these illegals who insist on staying undocumented because politicians like Dutch, omalley viva la mikulski cater to them with our tax $$.. Now we pay in excess of $2billion a year in md to illegals who cross our borders and have babies for profits.. We pay for their children. Every single one of them with welfare and its freebies they are allowed to get using fake/stolen ids. A legit id act was voted down in this state by most of the democrat liberals. It would of insisted that illegals Or 'undocumented" to make it sound a bit softer for you, would have to provide a legit id, birth cert, social security # etc before they got benefits, drivers license, jobs , food stamps etc. Whats wrong with that?
Tom Barnes
8:59 am on Friday, January 6, 2012
I stand by my statement, no matter how much you want to say things like "trap" and "liberal" (yes, I can imagine you spitting the words out) and throw dollar signs around. Hey, I have an idea siince it's all about money for you. How about if the churches give up their tax exempt status and help the illegal immigrants become citizens, since it is VERY expensive to do so? Then all these "christian republicans" wouldn't have a way of covering up their bigotry and would be way too exposed.
Lev 19:34: "You shall treat the stranger who sojourns with you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God."
Mark 8:36. "For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world and forfeit his soul?"
At some point we need to stop being so centered on a green piece of paper and start worrying about real people.. living breathing individuals. Got greed? Get God.
amdactivist
8:54 am on Friday, January 6, 2012
www.votesmart.org
Research your candidate before you vote for them. Please don't rely on their smooth words, a handshake and a smile
amdactivist
9:22 am on Friday, January 6, 2012
Tom, you are not a good christian if you believe that what I say is bigot.. I too read the bible and its very easy to pick and choose. Like i said, its not about immigrants its about illegal criminals.. The green paper what you elect to call money is so very important when you've lost your home and no money to feed your children because of illegal aliens. More then 1 million homes lost ever year for the past few years .. The illegal criminals *not immigrants* are coming to the land of the free and truly stealing our $$, jobs.. They come across border with gangs, weapons and disease. If the catholic church wants to make them all citizens *i'm also a catholic*, then go for it. I know in Md last year we have over 500,000 illegal aliens mostly in montgomery and baltimore city, and only 1000 became a citizen. The criminal aliens don't want to become citizens as its more productive to stay illegal then it is to become a citizen and be forced to use a legit id.. God helps those that help themselves.. Not steal from they neighbor. Remember the 10 commandments Tom? Thou shall not steal? Well they are stealing Tom. Open your eyes and use common sense when voting. You are one example of why our state and country is the way it is.. People moving out of md in groves with good reasons.. So to conclude, I am not a racist or bigot just using common sense and would love to give $$ to my own children's food and clothing then support criminals..Tell Linda I said hello..
Tom Barnes
9:36 am on Friday, January 6, 2012
Hmmmm. You don't know me. You don't know my background. In 1997 I was rear ended by a drunk driver & my c2 was broken (hangmans break). I ended up with permanent Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy. I was a single dad at the time, with my 1 year old infant living with me. I lost EVERYTHING - my home, my vehicle, my career, my savings - EVERYTHING. I learned that money means *NOTHING*. People do. God sometimes puts you on your back to make you look up. So do not surmise that I have no life experience & no sense of monetary "loss."
You may call them illegal & thieves. God calls them "His creation" - He did not draw lines on the planet. Man did. So you read your Bible & keep up the anger and spew the hatred like McDonough & Harris & Jacobs. They are wolves in sheeps clothing. As for me, I will read my Bible & praise my God through helping His creation. (con't)
Tom Barnes
9:36 am on Friday, January 6, 2012
(con't) Yes, Amdactivist, you are a bigot. You may hate it & you may claim you aren't, but everything you have said concludes that you are. You despise Muslims & you spew hatred against "illegals." You have forgotten (or perhaps never knew) your purpose on this earth. When you learn to take away the Almighty Dollar (our "false idol") & you learn to serve people, you become a better person. I am not superior to you, and I will not profess to be. I have my own bigotry. However, I choose to work & think past it. That is what makes us different.
As for being an example... Good. I prefer to be an example of what God has called us to do AND be - not a bigot who lives for a piece of green paper.
Tom Barnes
9:38 am on Friday, January 6, 2012
No idea what the Linda reference is about, Amd.
Otto Schmidlap
9:30 am on Friday, January 6, 2012
Mr. Barnes apparently believes that the constitution is a suicide pact. Did Jesus show tender, loving care to the moneychangers he threw out of the temple?
Tom Barnes
9:39 am on Friday, January 6, 2012
I think the Consitution was written by IMMIGRANTS. Surprise!
John F.
11:16 am on Friday, January 6, 2012
I've been taking a very serious look at Lt. Colonel Smith and find the fact that he is not an "insider" as very refreshing. Another great article by Bryan! We need folks that want to reform government not entrench themselves it it as Dutch has done. The fact remains that Jacob's is a career politician and is running as her final exit strategy from office.
amdactivist
1:08 pm on Friday, January 6, 2012
@tom. http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/learning_history/constitution/constitution_menu.cfm
yet again you compare immigrants to illegal criminals.. A big difference..
Tom Barnes
9:19 pm on Saturday, January 7, 2012
I call them human beings. I call them God's children. You can call them what you want. But when you stand before God - and you WILL stand before God, you sort it out with him. Not worth my time or breath to argue with you Amd. I am set in my ways and your bigotry does nothing to sway me away from my own moral compass.
sp0t
1:44 pm on Friday, January 6, 2012
"Harris 'is no puppet master.'"
I'd have to agree with his campaign manager. Calling him a "puppet master" is giving him way too much credit.
amdactivist
6:37 am on Saturday, January 7, 2012
@keith.. the right word might be support.. Here is just Dutch Ruppersburgers pattern and ratings.. Everything i say about this man is the truth. Dutch is a very personable guy and if it wasn't for his political stance I believe he is a very nice person but his politicings sucks. He and others in office make a good living beyond their normal salaries.These scores for Ruppersberger can change from year to year but here is some Idea on how our Md Congressman supports or Rather lack of support for our citizens/taxpayers of Maryland. You can
Learn a lot about our elected officials on this site..see continued post..
amdactivist
6:38 am on Saturday, January 7, 2012
Dontinued.. Meet Dutch Ruppersburger and his ratings..
Supported Small Business 5%
Americans for fair taxation 0%
Citizens against Government WAste 2%
Associated Builders of Md. 0%
National association of Government Contractors 100%
League of Women Voters 100%.. The MOst liberal of all.. I was affiliated with them at one time.
American Civil Liberties Union ACLU 86%
ARAB American institute 100%
Iranian American Political Action 100%
National Council of LaRaza 100%
Americans for Prosperity 0%
Campaign for working families 17%
Teachers of English to speakers of other LANguages 100%
Gun Owners of America gave him an 18% and an F rating
National Rifle Association gave him an F
American Immigration Lawyers 100%
Federation for American Immigration Reform 0%. *so Dutch don't think we need immigration reform?*
U.S. English Inc to preserve English as our native Language of our land 0%
National Latino Congreso/William C. Velásquez Institute 100%
U.S. Border control 33%
Americans for Better Immigration 36%
AFL-CIO 100% *supports unions*
Dutch Ruppersberger also likes the Muslim Brotherhood who has many known terrorist groups affiliated with them.
He supports planned parenthood and is Pro choice.
He supports LaRaza *the race* 100% *the largest National Hispanic civil rights group in the USA*.
http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=36130
Rob
10:03 am on Saturday, January 7, 2012
Unfortunately for us republicans are arguments are null and void, because here in Maryland we don't have a chance of ever having enough of a majority to change anything for the good. Maryland is now, has almost always been and will forever be ran by liberal democrats. Nothing good has happen for Maryland citizens in decades, everything is getting worse and will continue to do so. The only republican vote that will ever count in the state of Maryland is the one you make with your feet and mine is coming closer and closer. I pray for the day that I get to move from this miserable backward state.
Otto Schmidlap
10:59 am on Saturday, January 7, 2012
Right you are, Rob. Exhibit A: Shrewsbury, Pa.
Dkennylee
7:01 pm on Saturday, January 7, 2012
@ tom please stop with bible quotes religion and goverment dont mix for good reason ... You cant make true educated votes from a book "bible" telling all kind of far fetched stories please vote because of a persons record and actions, not your religion clouding your mind. Like love every one till were broke and ruin our nation. your right man drew lines and in the u.s.a we live by law of man not god .
Tom Barnes
9:18 pm on Saturday, January 7, 2012
Dkenny - I can make VERY sound decisions based on my moral compass, which is dictated by my spiritual beliefs. Every moment of my life is dictated by my spirituality - from raising my children to how I serve my community. My vote is also driven the saem way. Do not spend a single moment supposing that I should also vote that way.
Dkennylee
11:24 pm on Saturday, January 7, 2012
I'm sure your dicisions you make for your own life is good for you. But when your spirituality affected vote affects me there is a problem. Also if you lived buy all the verse's in the bible I'm sure you would have trouble with the law of the land again Im sure you make good choices for you and your kids ..but it seems people like to quote just the parts of the bible that works or them and not in the whole text or meaning .
Dkennylee
11:58 pm on Saturday, January 7, 2012
hey whoa hey there ... hey never said you didnt have the right ti feel anyway you want. I have 3 kids 2 wonderfull grandkids we live in no such world of"hard hearted darkness path of cold and hate" First and let me spell this simple for ya I love my country the country you live in.. it has laws YOU WILL AND DO live by them no matter how you feel inside or how i feel inside. our country was founded on being a american and there were laws set up to be one. I am a american because my parents WERE americans period. no matter what your book says that is were YOU live. I didnt make the laws or your book. I think all people are equall TO COME HERE LEGALLY. and be treated fairly and i like this line so im gonna use it here
I stand where I stand and I am unmoveable, unshakeable and resolved
.
.
amdactivist
9:29 pm on Saturday, January 7, 2012
tom. you don't have the right or knowledge to call people bigots especially when you admit to being one. I call it illegal criminals as they should be called. They are stealing. What part of that don't you understand. same as if i stole your money.. God helps those that help themselves. You surely aren't a good christian if you believe stealing is ok..
Rob
9:43 pm on Saturday, January 7, 2012
DKennylee: You need to go back and re-read the constitution because it's founded on the belief in God. As for me I live by the law of God first all these other laws are laws only when you get caught breaking them. But in all situations commonsense should rule your life. Here's a something to live your life by - "If you don't believe in God you'll believe in anything."
Bart
10:40 pm on Saturday, January 7, 2012
No, Rob. You need to reread the Constitution.
God is not in the constitution. Also there is the rule within that: " but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."
The founders of this country did not want a belief or non-belief in God to be a factor in their new government.
Dkennylee
11:02 pm on Saturday, January 7, 2012
hey rob "wall of separation between church and state," as written in Thomas Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in 1802. The original text reads: "... I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church & State." Jefferson reflected his frequent speaking theme that the government is not to interfere with religion. also I never said anything about god I said a book like im sure you would not want people to vote a certain way because they read a watchtower book " Jehovah witness" or a someone else that read a comic strip .. also you might hink you live the law of god .. and im sure it makes you fell better at bedtime, but trust me when it comes down to it YOU DO live by the law of man. there would be alot of murders if you just lived the law of god. he doest put you in the pokey. also for some reason I cant correct my typos just so the grammer nazis out there i did try lol
Rob
1:03 pm on Sunday, January 8, 2012
I got my documents mixed up, The Declaration of Independence states that we are all endowed by our creator (God).
Separation of Church and State does not mean that Government is free of God. Most Presidents invoke their belief in God and how they look to him to make the right decisions. Go read George Washington farewell speech and tell me where there's no reference to God and his influence in the shaping of America including her government.
Rob
1:06 pm on Sunday, January 8, 2012
I forgot to mention that I stated that man's laws are only laws when you get caught breaking them. I don't murder for fear of jail, I don't do it for the fear of God.
Tom Barnes
2:11 pm on Sunday, January 8, 2012
Had to chuckle, Rob. Love the line "I don't murder for fear of jail, I don't do it for the fear of God." So true!
amdactivist
7:57 am on Sunday, January 8, 2012
@tom barnes. Did I hear you say your taught love so you love jacobs/harris/mdc and me? There are differences in good and evil and even God knows that. Read the bible and decipher any way you want. Right is Right and wrong is wrong and you my friend is wrong..Have a good day..
amdactivist
8:59 am on Sunday, January 8, 2012
Tom. you keep stressing your love for people in the same sentence as your hate in others? I am not a hater of anyone but I do hate their criminal actions called thievery. "thou shall not steal".. remember? Try and decipher the 2..
amdactivist
10:17 am on Sunday, January 8, 2012
Tom. your not a christian just a wanna b talker who preaches God yet think people evil. I was taught we are all Children of God and we all bleed red. We are all connected no matter what race/religion etc. For you to get on any public site and proclaim to be a christian which is great if you are a christian yet call people evil because they express their views and truths isn't the christian way.. I won't respond to you any longer. feel free to get the last word and have a good day and Bless..Been nice sparring with you.. tell Linda hi..
Dkennylee
1:58 pm on Sunday, January 8, 2012
@ rob One common misuse of the Declaration of Independence is to argue that it states that our rights come from God and, therefore, there are no legitimate interpretations of the rights in the Constitution that would be contrary to God. The first problem is that the Declaration of Independence refers to a “Creator” and not the Christian “God” meant by people making the argument. The second problem is that the “rights” mentioned in the Declaration of Independence are “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” — none of which are “rights” discussed in the Constitution.
Finally, the Declaration of Independence also makes it clear that governments created by humanity derive their powers from the consent of the governed, not from any gods. This is why the Constitution does not make any mention of any gods. There is no reason to think that there is anything illegitimate about an interpretation of any of the rights outlined in the Constitution merely because it runs contrary to what some people think that their conception of a god would want.
What this all means is that arguments against the separation of church and state which rely upon the language of the Declaration of Independence fail. First, the document in question has no legal authority with which one could make a legal case. Second, the sentiments expressed therein do not support the principle that government should be guided either by any specific religion (like Christianity)
Bart
8:26 pm on Sunday, January 8, 2012
The Declaration of Independence was a more "passionate" document; the colonies were breaking away from England, their master. Thus, the more passionate "creator" mention.
The constitution was the LAW. More formal and deliberate. Thus, no mention of "creator". This document would have to last, absent the passion, and included the rule that there would be no religion test. A clear separation of church and state by its very omission.
Dkennylee
2:10 pm on Sunday, January 8, 2012
@ rob also i read that letter and it was alot of reading and i fail to see anyyhing about god could ya send me a line out of it ? also it would be a big no no for a president to say he doesnt believe in god ...as with all the presidents. with some of the things they have to and do would go against there god..... how hard would it be to say yes to war ...i believe they say what they need to
Paul Amirault
7:39 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Good morning DK, although I believe that many Presidents in the past and maybe present were/are atheists they cannot say so. An atheist/humanist cannot be elected in this country or any other.
Paul Amirault
7:44 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012
DK, your analysis of the Constitution and Dec of Ind is well thought and very deep. I am afraid many will not agree with you. I commend you on your well thought out analysis.
Dkennylee
2:11 pm on Sunday, January 8, 2012
oops no spell check sorry above
Josephine Hlatki
4:25 pm on Sunday, January 8, 2012
Has anyone noticed yet just how far off the original topic you've gotten? It's ridiculous.
Dkennylee
11:14 pm on Sunday, January 8, 2012
Yea we notice lol
Scott Sewell
7:00 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Hey Tom, do you also use the name Robert Armstrong?
Paul Amirault
7:31 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012
I'll leave some grenades for this party, looks like a love fest.
Tom Barnes
7:32 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Scott, No I don't.
Dkennylee
2:59 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Hey paul thanks I like some history now:)
Paul Amirault
3:09 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Knowledge will set you free, all kidding aside, you were insightful. Keep going!
George Helm
11:42 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
It's amazing to me that anyone would think they are being represented by politicians that vote straight party lines. Remember people, this is Maryland and no republican is going to beat, "Mr. Eminent Domain", Dutch Ruppersburger or, "The Meanest Woman in Congress", Babs Mikulski! Reading the comments is absolutely hilarious!
amdactivist
12:24 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
George we still have to try by voting.. We can't give up right?