.
Feedback

What's That Number Again?

Gov. Martin O'Malley briefs the media on his budget but forgets one important figure.

Media from around the state just broke from a news conference with Gov. Martin O'Malley during which they were briefed on his proposed 2013 state budget.

But one of the most important numbers was missing—exactly how big O'Malley's proposed budget will be.

During the event O'Malley talked to the press about spending $4 billion on jobs ($3.6 billion in the capital budget) and shifting $240 million in teacher pension costs to local governments and an increase in the flush tax based on usage.

He also put off questions about a possible gas tax saying he'd answer those questions another day.

But how much is the actual budget? He didn't mention it during the nearly one-hour briefing and neither did his staff. It wasn't in his press release.

He did say it was a 1.9 percent increase over the current budget.

It wasn't until the media signed for and was handed their copies of the five volume budget book set that we learned the bottom line number is about $35.9 billion (including reserve fund expenditures). That's actually a 3 percent increase from the current $34.8 billion budget. (The governor's number appears to exclude reserve fund expenditures.)

We'll have more on the budget and it's potential impact soon.

kevin January 18, 2012 at 05:25 pm
wow are you inferring O'Malley Lied?
Carole January 18, 2012 at 05:40 pm
This scares the living heck out of me. He is out of control and there is no one, I repeat not one soul who is going to stop it. All I have to say is may god bless his brazen soul for he does not know what he does.
Paul Amirault January 18, 2012 at 06:13 pm
Yes he does, he is looking for higher office! Whether that be Senate or more, it is coming.
Tim January 18, 2012 at 06:29 pm
more like a half-truth. He said O'Malley was using selective statistics. Nothing unusual here, and certainly not immoral compared to, I dunno, every other national level politician.
Whether you approve of that or not determines how you should handle any future offices he runs for. Goes for both parties candidates, really.
Will January 19, 2012 at 12:30 am
He wants to raise taxes during a recession to increase spending. Spending increased 3% last year after many years of larger increases. This is a path that will not end good.
Can't we try holding spending increases to inflation for a little while?
Bob January 19, 2012 at 12:36 am
when has O'malley told the truth?
Bob January 19, 2012 at 12:39 am
so, he's pushing out businesses from the state, keeps taxing people to poverty and favors illegals, yes, this guy is bad, real bad. I'll never vote for this corrupt politician again! he needs to be recalled.
Bob January 19, 2012 at 12:40 am
He's not smart enough to grasp that concept.
Tim January 19, 2012 at 01:10 am
Wait, there's still businesses in this state?
Nick January 19, 2012 at 01:45 am
The slick little weasel strikes again. For all you parents out there, he reminds me of Swiper the Fox. (without any of the redeeming qualities)
MTH January 19, 2012 at 02:25 am
This man reminds me of Obama!
Paul Amirault January 19, 2012 at 02:39 am
I hope all those overtaxed businesses leave the state, that will give me a great opportunity to take over the entire market. Tim, you in 50-50?
LalainMaryland January 19, 2012 at 03:08 am
Moving the money for pensions to local jurisdictions will bankrupt the local counties!
Dick January 19, 2012 at 12:00 pm
I'm retired and on a fixed income. I have lived in Montgomery County since 1967 and am now seriously considering moving to a more tax-friendly state. I don't think Maryland or Montgomery County has the will to bring spending under control.
Karl Schuub January 19, 2012 at 12:52 pm
Lalain: Of course it won't; they;ll just raise your property taxes locally; either that or install red light cameras at every intersection (opps that's already been done). As already demonstrated just a week or so ago, since these public employees are their friends and colleagues they'll come first (eg. the recent stuffing of taxpayers dollars into pockets of only the public employees for this bonus). It'll all be framed around "fairness". Nobody wants to do the dirtywork here - face reality and bite the bullet in what is clearly an unsustainable structure for public employee pay and benefits. Bend over taxpayers - get ready to once again get kicked in the arse. You better work until you're 70 - your neighbor who'll retire at 60 needs you as a mule.
Tim January 19, 2012 at 04:00 pm
ahahahahahaha
Tim January 19, 2012 at 04:01 pm
Obama's a minor league tax/spender, compared to O'Malley.
Tim January 19, 2012 at 04:08 pm
Exactly - if nothing's done about it.
As Karl mentioned, the crap rolls downhill. This is why I still hold the view (federally) that one has to be careful what they wish for re: massive government reduction. It's not just going to disappear without major consequence. State funding gets bled out, and the daisy chain continues on down. It's what really shines the light of insanity on Owe'Malley. He's trying to increase taxes AND reduce outlay to the county governments. It's insanity that this misinformed state has elected not once, but twice. The first term he got, ok, I'll give that to you. He was a competent mayor from what I could see. He deserved one term. However voters are supposed to learn from their mistakes.
Ed Jr. January 19, 2012 at 11:39 pm
OMalley is a pompous fool and could really use an ass-kicking...
Bob January 20, 2012 at 01:04 am
talk to bechtel. They are moving to Virginia.
Carole January 20, 2012 at 02:21 pm
Hear, Hear, but whom, who in this one party state, one newspaper town, is willing to take this pompous arse on? Even his supporters can now see he is out of control, but to expose it is to admit they are also pompous arses followers. All I can say is be creative with your wallet and "let them eat cake". Our wallets are more powerful then they will ever know.
Karl Schuub January 20, 2012 at 02:51 pm
Yes, Carole most of us here in Harford know that, but this state is controlled by 3 counties and a city; O'Malley as with all the other democrats in charge can count on always being reelected if they redistribute your money to minorities and the poor, and keep feeding public employees what they want because federal employees populate the other three counties in tremendous numbers. You might as well call it corruption because the result isn't much different - you have no representation if you want accountability or to reduce the size of government in MD - it will never happen because they'll keep voting and acting to remove your dollars from your pocket to give it to thier friends who'll reelect them.
kevin January 20, 2012 at 03:25 pm
Vote out the national delegates and senator throughout the state in 2012. O'Malley will only pay attention if it effects his national spotlight.If you don't want to subsidize his friends and family whose business is the only one he is taking care of (wind power which his former staff and employees are running the companies that will get the contract).If you don't live in the big three the only way to stop this ego manic is by hitting him where it hurts. forget your LOCAL representatives you can't hurt them by 2014 if you wait that long you'll be bankrupt or trying to have your children marry an O'Malley or Curran .Why not eliminate Joe Currans job and use that savings ?
Carole January 20, 2012 at 05:16 pm
Then we have no choice but to cut off the funding to those counties and the City of Baltimore eh? Where there is a will, there is a way.
Karl Schuub January 21, 2012 at 09:58 pm
Why can't we give Prince Georges and Montgomery Counties to the district known as DC? Dump them... The reason our forefathers created this DC district and didn't give them voting rights was they understood when you have a concentration of people dependent upon activities in the government (eg. part of government) there won't ever be a possibility for fair representation for anyone beyond the government. It's not different now - this state is being destroyed by special interests; driven by government influence and left hung out to dry are the few of us left who work in the private sector. Give the government who they want - like a obedient vampire victim those folks are drunken on blood and are lost. It will be our ruination if we don't get rid of them.
CB9678 January 22, 2012 at 06:57 pm
Wow you want to jetisen about 33% of the population of the state?
kevin January 23, 2012 at 01:08 am
cb9678 only about 5% work outside of goverment and union jobs.Let them have thier own state.Schaffer wanted to take over DC when he became govenor to create an unbeatable Democratic state .It happened anyway.By the way does anyone else notice Helen Bentley STILL selfishly working for our state and port and accomplishing great things?How much better off would we have been if they honestly counted votes and she beat SPENDENING?
CB9678 January 23, 2012 at 02:19 am
I thought Ellen Sauerbrey ran against Parris Glendening?
Carole January 23, 2012 at 03:12 pm
For anyone who cares, here is a nice article to read;
O'Malley's March to Washington http://www.nationalreview.com/blogs/print/288802
amdactivist January 27, 2012 at 01:26 am
corrupt deep pocket politicians and pensions is what got us in this mess. Do away with all of it.. why don't people pay into 401k's or other investments. Taxpayers should not be burdened with paying any of it..Look at the size of government and how much we pay for all their pensions.. Omalley is a weasle and a liar and has no problems giving illegal alien criminals $2billion a year of our money.. Somebody keeps voting these fleas back in office. Maybe the democrats vote and the others just talk about chit..

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Towson Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kathleen Williams June 9, 2013 at 02:46 pm
How did YOU GUYS get to be the plural of YOU. I guess the same way NO PROBLEM replaced YOU'RERead More WELCOME.
Sanchez June 10, 2013 at 04:13 pm
It's "yuz guys" hon. Like "see yuz guys at the bowin ally."
Ruth Schaefer May 17, 2013 at 08:14 pm
This 30-foot, 7-ton holly tree was removed to make room for the extension and will be replanted toRead More live on in the yard of a happy Towson family.