A bill authorizing gambling expansion in Maryland will likely be amended, according to the chairman of the House subcommittee that is holding hearings on the legislation.
Del. Frank Turner, a Howard County Democrat, initially characterized possible changes to the bill passed Friday by the Senate as minor.
"Mostly it's a lot of tweaks," said Turner, the chairman of the House Ways and Means subcommittee on Gaming Law and Regulation.
When asked what concerns his committee might have, Turner suggested the changes might be more substantive.
"I think there are concerns everywhere," Turner said. "There are all kinds of concerns and ideas. Some will be germane and others won't. I think we're going to make it a better work product than what the Senate sent over."
Turner's subcommittee, which met for 90 minutes on Saturday afternoon, is expected to meet again on Monday. Amendments to the Senate's version of the bill are expected to be discussed.
The Senate version authorizes a sixth casino location in an area of Prince George's County that includes Rosecroft Raceway and National Harbor. The bill also authorizes table games in the state.
The Senate, which completed its work Friday, is not scheduled to reconvene until 7 p.m. Tuesday.
Because the law authorizing casinos is part of the Maryland Constitution, voters would have to approve the changes in a referendum vote on Nov. 6. The fate of the sixth casino location rests solely in the hands of the voters in Prince George's County who must vote in favor of the project in order for it to move forward.
Del. Jolene Ivey, a Prince George's County Democrat, raised concerns about one Senate provision that calls for one of the seven-member gaming commission to be appointed from a jurisdiction that currently have video slots facilities.
"It could be that that one member could be from Anne Arundel County and it could be, perhaps, I'm not saying it will be, that that member wouldn't necessarily look with kindness on certain other facilities," said Ivey.
Ivey declined to elaborate on her specific concerns following the meeting. Her comments appear to be directed toward Maryland Live! Casino and its owner David Cordish.
Cordish has been critical of the proposed Prince George's County facility.
Del. Eric Luedtke, a Montgomery County Democrat, said he shared Ivey's concerns and planned to offer an amendment creating a joint House-Senate committee to oversee the gaming commission.
Also of concern to Del. Melvin Stukes is a requirement that Baltimore City's local share of table game revenues to be spent on school construction.
"We need money for school construction but I don't think we let anything supersede our number one push," said Stukes. "When we came on board with this in 2007 it was property tax [reduction] not school construction."
Baltimore City's property tax rate is $2.268 per $100 of assessed value. That's more than double the $1.10 per $100 of assessed value in Baltimore County.
After the hearing, Stukes said he believes the House will amend the Senate bill to split the city's share of table game revenue between school construction, recreation and parks and property tax relief.
Any House amendments to the bill would require approval by the Senate.
The House Ways and Means subcommittee will resume its work on the bill some time Monday morning, Turner said. A vote on the bill by the full House of Delegates might not come before Tuesday.
"I think we have a lot of work to do but we'll move through it quickly," Turner said.
"Maryland right now allows only red-light cameras, but the town of Glen Echo wants the state legislature to expand government’s reach to include photo-ticketing for intersections with stop signs." http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/09/stop-sign-cameras-coming-next-to-your-town/
We don't need more casinos. We need smart casinos that are set up like real casinos without all these silly MD restrictions, in smart locations to attract out of state money. Something close to VA is the best idea. Just close Ocean Downs or Perryville and move the machines there. After all, we own them. Too many casinos in the wrong places just dilutes the market. A casino in Baltimore City will just be a crime-ridden dump in no time. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out. i can only conclude that the decisions on this issue made in Annapolis so far have been made from sheer stupidity or the usual MD corruption.
Why not end the idea of large gambling institutions and allow bar owners to have slot machines? They could be regulated by the MD State Lottery. They can pay the state $1000 per machine/per year and must declare the profits with their business taxes. The current model only allows for the billion dollar companies already in the casino business to be at the table. We will never have fresh, local upstarts, in the casino business with our current model.
Georgia St. University study with too many points to mention: http://www2.gsu.edu/~psyjge/Fact/PG_%20Crime_04_10.pdf U. of Wis. study finds total cost of Wis.'s problem gamblers was over $300k. http://www.wpri.org/Reports/Volume9/Vol9no6.pdf Auburn University shows Societal Costs in mid-1990's being $13k-$53k/yr/pathological gambler including an early 1990's Maryland study showing a cost of $30k/yr/gambler, not pathological gambler, gambler, full stop: http://www.walkerd.people.cofc.edu/pubs/JGS1999.pdf There's more. Do you need more?
http://www6.montgomerycountymd.gov/content/POL/districts/ISB/majorcrimes/Warrants/warrant.htm
Good to know Frank you are the worlds best driver and ALWAYS follow the law 100 % of the time and come to a 100% stop 100% of the time. Got self righteousness?
For the government to promote this kind of public destruction is criminal, and a clear sign of the direction that the entire country is headed. The apathetic, dumbed down public, ( who are the majority) don't have a clue. Those that buy into the illusion are just plain dumb.
Suit jerseys. Track suit!Everything.Inexpensive.Synthesis. This is the comprehensive trade websit http://www.shoesmallshop.com/ integrated comprehensive foreign trade websiteke how you're trying to frame this game as close when the return TD shouldn't have counted and the Niners would have won by 2TDs. GB had no answer for the Niners' defense all day lo