.

GTCCA Lauds County Council's Passage of Limited Signage Bill

The legislation, proposed by Councilman David Marks, was spurred by community ire about signs at bail bond shops.

Community members are pleased that a bill proposed by Councilman David Marks to limit signage at businesses passed the council Tuesday night.

"We're thankful that Councilman Marks got this through," said Paul Hartman, president of the Greater Towson Council of Community Associations, at a Thursday night meeting.

The bill was presented to the county council after Marks heard community complaints about signs posted on properties where bail bail shops are located. In particular, residents were upset about a large orange sign posted on a stick by Bail Bonds Inc. at the intersection of East Chesapeake and Virginia avenues and signage at Double D Bail Bonds on Chesapeake Avenue depicting a well-endowed woman in handcuffs and jail stripes.

Marks had previously called the signs "very disturbing" and Hartman referred to them as outrageous.

Though the bill initially targeted bail bond shops, it was expanded to include all businesses.

Now, for all businesses 600 feet in any direction from the Historic East Towson neighborhood, neon signage must be 4 square feet. All signs mounted on a pole must also have a brick or masonry base, and can be no higher than six feet tall.

Businesses have six months to comply with the new regulations.

Correction: An earlier version of this article had incorrect information about the limited signage bill. Patch regrets the error.

Ed February 23, 2013 at 02:48 AM
Stuts, this is not a comment on Marks or an opinion on the move of the fire station. (A new one needs to be built, either on the current site or another appropriate area.) But as someone who grew up on Fairmount Avenue near Bosley, I can tell you that SOMEONE is hearing the sirens now. Moving the station might mean that another neighborhood will be hearing the sirens in the future and maybe the communities that have been hearing them since they were developed in the mid 1950s won't be hearing them quite so much.
JDStuts February 23, 2013 at 04:10 AM
True. But the decision maker is unresponsive and not addressing the issue that the proposed location will negatively impact the property values of an existing neighborhood. One neighborhood since the 50's has dealt with this. Now the solution is to burn out another to foster the discounted sale of taxpayer property to developers in order for an outsider to promote his goal of a Towson City? If he doesn't live here he shouldn't tell us what we should accept.
Ed February 23, 2013 at 04:16 AM
But stuts, I just found out the new site is near the county government buildings, not the Towson Manor park. There are very few homes near the currently planned site. I do not understand the concerns about the new fire site.
LiveWork Towson February 23, 2013 at 01:19 PM
I appreciate Marks' efforts on this matter. While the legislation is limitted in scope, it is meant to protect a local historic community without imposing rules that would make further development throughout Towson overly burdensome. Marks worked with community leaders and refined this bill based on feedback received. While it may not be perfect or ideal, it will address the current issues and prevent future similar problems in that particular area of town.
Mike Pierce February 24, 2013 at 06:22 PM
Thanks to David Marks for pushing this issue. Now if Code Enforcement actually enforces the law as written, rather than dreaming up every excuse they can for not enforcing it, as they have in other cases. I predict that, within a year, the Council will need to revise it to get enforcement as intended.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »