.

Hairston Won't Commit to Restoring Teacher Positions

The Baltimore County Council expresses irritation over not being shown new policy on use of school facilities.

As with other much-ballyhooed matches, the anticipated confrontation between the Baltimore County Council and Baltimore County Public Schools Superintendent Joe A. Hairston fell far short of the hype.

Many felt that the council would have put Hairston on the hot seat over issues related to the elimination of nearly 200 teaching positions, a policy on the public's use of schools and the hiring of a new deputy superintendent.

Instead, the council pressed Hairston very little during the nearly two-hour hearing.

The superintendent, flanked by several dozen top aides, administrators and school board members, also remained noncommittal to requests that he restore teaching positions.

"I was surprised the council didn't apply more pressure," said Cheryl Bost, president of the Teachers Association of Baltimore County.

Council Chairman John A. Olszewski Sr. had signaled earlier this year that he intended to use Tuesday's budget hearing as a forum to pressure Hairston to cut from the proposed 2012 budget.

By eliminating the positions, the school system saves nearly $16 million in its $1.3 billion budget. All of the eliminated positions will come from retirements and resignations, school officials said.

"No one is getting a pink slip," one unidentified school official told the council.

Olszewski asked Hairston if he would consider restoring the positions should the schools system budget show a surplus in excess of $16 million.

"I'd like to remind the council we have a looming 2013 budget that is predicted to be worse than this one," Hairston said. "It's too premature to make any decision."

"We put $15 million into the budget just to hold on to teachers," Hairston said.

After the meeting, Olszewski remained optimistic.

"He didn't commit to it and I didn't expect that he would commit to it," Olszewski said. "In the end, we can be advocates and make recommendations, and that's what we did today."

School Use Policy Coming

One issue that did generate a few tense moments came after Hairston revealed that school officials had revised the policy governing the use of schools by the public—commonly called .

The new policy, which is expected to be voted on as early as June, contains several changes, including:

  • Eliminating the need for insurance for groups of 50 or less.
  • For-profit groups can apply to use the facilities
  • Community groups can contract with third-party vendors for things like craft fairs.
  • There will be an appeal process for denials.

Michelle Prumo, Hairston's chief of staff, told the council the new policy would be available to the public in a week and online until June 19 for public comment.

Olszewski, sounding irritated, question Hairston about why copies of the policy were not brought to the council Tuesday.

"This is a very important issue we are trying to resolve within our communities," Olszewski said.

"You're talking about something that is 18 hours old," Hairston responded.

 

Read the of the County Council's hearing on the schools system budget.

Keep up with what's going on in Baltimore County Politics with Bryan P. Sears' blog and follow him on Facebook and Twitter.

LT guy May 18, 2011 at 10:46 AM
Hairston should be looking to cut 2 or more staff positions for every teaching slot he cuts. His non-teaching bureaucracy is bloated. But he's probably right about one thing: the 2013 budget is likely to be worse than this one. He is prudent to think that way.
superawesomechick May 19, 2011 at 05:41 AM
Hairston makes an excessive amount of money, his salary should be halved...that alone would pay for atleast 3 teaching positions.
Ryan Teves May 19, 2011 at 01:29 PM
What is most frustrating about the teacher cuts is how they are done, not just that they are done. In the private sector, the trimming of a large workforce is almost a natural process and might even make the company better, but in schools the process simply isn't rational. In schools, the rule is "the last to be hired, the first to be fired." It is crazy and a disservice to the kids that their is no other measuring stick for how we decide which teachers to keep besides time. So, teachers that have continued to disappoint parents and kids stay, while some young, talented, and eager teacher is let go. This is a big part of the problem with our schools. Ryan Teves author of "In Defense of the American Teen"

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something