Occhipinti: No $63 million bill for Hoboken

City Council member says mayor is just trying to scare the public.

Editor's note: The Hoboken City Council will vote Sunday on whether to grant a parking waiver to the company trying to purchase Hoboken University Medical Center, to allow the sale of the hospital to proceed. Six council members need to approve the measure, but in a recent vote, only five did so, putting the sale of the hospital in jeopardy. In this article, Councilman Tim Occipinti questions the sale. In a letter to the editor, posted on the Hoboken Patch front page, Dr. Jonathan M. Metsch argues in favor of the sale.

Mayor Dawn Zimmer is sending out the wrong message about the Hoboken University Medical Center deal, said Hoboken City Council Member Timothy Occhipinti. “Mayor Zimmer is intentionally setting a panic button,” he said.

The mayor has claimed that the city would have to pay $63 million in 60 days if the sale of the hospital to HUMC Holdco does not close. But Occhipinti said, “That isn’t true.” He said the bond holders bought the bonds with a 20-year return. Hoboken taxpayers have guaranteed their return, said Occhipinti, but if the hospital collapses, the bond holders are not going to ask for the lump sum of $63 million.

He said that if the Hoboken Municipal Hospital Authority defaults on its payments to the bond holders, Hoboken taxpayers are on the hook to pay them, but the city could pay in smaller amounts, as the authority would have. In the bond agreement, said Occhipinti, it states that the authority has to pay the bond holders about $4.5 million a year in two separate payments, and the next payment wouldn’t come due until Jan. 12, 2012. “It comes down to the fact that if the authority can’t make that payment and risks default, I am pretty sure the city of Hoboken can make that payment for them; therefore, they pay their bill and the bond holders are happy,” said Occhipinti. He added that if the authority is in good standing with the bond holders, the bond holders have no right to ask for all of the money. “There is no $63 million coming due,” said Occhipinti.

Occhipinti said that in general, he is not happy with what’s been negotiated. “The whole thing is a bad deal, from the hospital sale to the parking agreement,” he said. To make the deal better, he said he’d like to see a deed restriction mandating that the property be used as a hospital for at least seven years.

Occhipinti acknowledged that the deal the hospital authority negotiated with the buyer, HUMC Holdco, requires the facility operate as a hospital for seven years. But, he said, if HUMC Holdco starts operating at a loss, he believes it could close the hospital before the seven years are up. Occhipinti said it’s optimistic to think the hospital could stay open another seven years anyway. “It’s been operating at a loss,” he said. “It’s getting better, but it is still operating at a loss.” And if HUMC Holdco has to close the hospital, said Occhipinti, he’s afraid a developer might obtain the land and build condos, with the bonus of the parking agreement tied to the hospital.

The parking agreement, said Occhipinti, should also be restricted in that it should only be in effect if the property is operating as a hospital. He added that if a developer has the benefit of parking at the Midtown Garage next to the property, the developer might find a way to get around having to provide parking underneath any residential units the developer builds on the site.

Occhipinti also said he just doesn’t trust the Alabama-based company, Medical Properties Trust, that is helping HUMC Holdco make the purchase. “These guys are in this for the real estate value,” said Occhipinti. “This is about real estate.” He added that MPT is pushing for the immediate enforcement of the parking agreement because the company doesn’t want there to be any time to petition. “They want to waive those 20 days, basically ripping the public’s right to petition against the law and put [the parking agreement] into effect immediately,” said Occhipinti. He added that he would rather see a non-profit buy the hospital.

Though he was one of the four Council members who voted against the parking agreement last week, Occhipinti said he is still thinking about his vote for Sunday’s Council meeting. “I am considering everything,” he said.

Redrider765 October 31, 2011 at 03:48 PM
Actually they were pretty dumb comments especially to someone like me who actually read the bond indenture. The man has absolutely no clue WTF is going on. You know that saying that says "the lights are on but nobody's home"? Tim is so clueless that his lights aren't on. Tim completely ignores the fact that when the bondholders accelerate the bonds, we don't have to option of paying what we want to pay. They come due and we must repay. It isn't optional. You don't get a choice to pay them in dribs and drabs or in full. You must repay every penny and if you don't pay, the bondholders can actually file the city for bankruptcy with or without our permission. That is how those things work and if Tim had bothered to check w/ any finance professional over at his firm, he'd know that. But hey, it is all moot. The 4 idiots got a stern talking to from the county, the state and the citizens and they backed down. That is what matters. Have to laugh that you think binder boy is rational and thoughtful though. That is pretty funny, you have to admit that. You think the 1 person on the CC who can't put 2 words together w/o a script is smart. Way too funny!
Hoboken1653 October 31, 2011 at 03:51 PM
well said CCJ. There are people aligned with the old guard who have told me a number of times that when speaking to Tim he couldn't offer them an opinion on an issue cause he hadn't checked with his handlers yet. And Tim blatantly admitted it
JosephGoebbels October 31, 2011 at 03:54 PM
Good work, Apprentice Sinatra! Keep repeating the outlandish claim that people actually respect your stooge Occhipinti. Someone will believe it. Repeat, repeat, repeat and even the most bizarre claims will be believed by the "great unwashed." They are sheep to be led. Lead them, my Apprentice, lead them!
FAP October 31, 2011 at 04:03 PM
There's an internet addage that the first person to call the other person a nazi loses the argument. Congrats. . Now do everyone a favor and never use this user again. I think there are better ways to make your argument. The question is are you up to finding them.
JosephGoebbels October 31, 2011 at 08:24 PM
Oh we quite agree. It is premature to label Master Sinatra a full member of my beloved party. He is, however, a most promising apprentice and has already fully learned one of my essential dictums. To wit: "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." He has demonstrated his full understanding with his claim that a growing number support young Occhipinti and find him, what was the word, thoughtful? Splendid, apprentice Sinatra, simply splendid!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »