By Rashee Raj Kumar
Capital News Service
Hundreds of gun rights advocates rallied outside the State House Wednesday in opposition to new gun control measures proposed by Gov. Martin O’Malley.
As O’Malley testified in favor of new gun restrictions before the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee, protesters outside said his proposals to ban assault weapons, limit magazine sizes and strengthen licensing measures would erode their rights.
Jay Hanlon, a retiree from Silver Spring, held a sign arguing that the Second Amendment protected gun ownership, including assault weapons, as a check against “Domestic Enemies.”
“That’s the weapon we need to defend ourselves against a government gone bad—against our oppressors,” said Hanlon, 65.
Kerry Nelson, 49, a former Marine who works as a U.S. Navy contractor, said he was tired of politicians arguing that assault weapons and large capacity magazines should be banned because they were not used by hunters and sports shooters.
“I keep hearing the argument that I don’t need 30 rounds to kill a deer. They’re absolutely 100 percent correct. It has absolutely nothing to do with the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment is for protection, primarily against our government should our government turn into a tyrannical government,” said Nelson, who is from St. Mary’s County.
Efforts to impose new restrictions on guns intensified after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, CT, in December. President Barack Obama and O’Malley both proposed new gun control regulations following the tragedy.
The protesters gathered on Lawyers Mall outside the State House said that any new restrictions must not infringe on their constitutional rights.
Harry H. Fahl, a photographer from Essex, warmed up the crowd in the morning by leading a group recitation of the Second Amendment, which quickly turned into a chant.
Fahl, 65, said he came to the rally because he feared that new gun control proposals by O’Malley and Obama showed that the nation was moving away from democracy towards communism.
He adopted his 16-year-old daughter from China 15 years ago, and he said he was worried that the United States was transforming into the repressive society she left behind.
“This bill doesn’t represent safety,” he said of O’Malley’s proposals. “It represents a destruction of our personal freedoms and a crumbling of our society.”
Fahl said he needed high-capacity ammunition magazines to protect his home and his daughter. A security alarm thwarted a recent break-in, he said.
“What if my 16-year-old daughter had been there? And what if the person would have gotten in?” he asked. “I’d much rather have that intruder lying in a pool of blood than my daughter. Period.”
Sarah Merkle, a 15-year-old student from Baltimore who has been shooting since she was 8, said she was worried that the ban on assault rifles would limit her educational opportunities.
Merkle, who attended the rally with her mother, Karen Merkle, said she shoots an AR-15 competitively and was hoping to secure a college scholarship.
She addressed the crowd at the rally with a message for the governor.
“Martin O’Malley, you can’t take my guns, you can’t take my rights,” she said.
LIBERTY and the Pursuit of Happiness are why our inalienable rights guaranteed to us in the United States Constitution you are quoting shall not be infringed upon.
George Washington
It says a lot about the character of the company and the people who continue to purchase them.
What a twisted and obscene connection to those who exercise their constitutional civil rights legally and those who don't.
http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2013/03/new_orleans_judge_rules_statut.html
‘I begged them not to kill my baby’: Tragedy as 13-month-old toddler is shot dead in his stroller by teenage robber in front of mother She told how one of them, who looked about 15, demanded money from her and threatened to kill her if she didn't give him any. She told him she didn't have any. 'He said: "Well, I'm going to kill your baby", and I said "Please don't kill my baby."
Now carry on.
I'm not going to rehash my argument because you've already heard it, but to say this Constitutional argument to keep these sole high-capacity magazines is ridiculous. You know it and I know it.
"voters last year approved by a sweeping majority a constitutional amendment backed by the National Rifle Association. That bill made gun ownership a "fundamental right," on the same level as freedom of speech or religion." How radical is that Westboro Steve/Jack Hays? You're sick dude! The rest of the story "An Orleans Parish judge on Thursday ruled that the state statute forbidding certain felons from possessing firearms is unconstitutional, in the wake of a constitutional amendment passed last year that made the right to bear arms a fundamental one in Louisiana. The issue will now go straight to the state Supreme Court, which must decide whether the statute infringes on Louisiana citizens' now-enhanced right to gun possession. " THIS is why I have to copypasta that annoys you and a few others. One must stand up and support the truth from you propagandists. You what I think is the real sick part? That the state needed to spell out by this amendment that the 2nd Amendment was equal to the rest! We are under that kind of attack by the progressives. That is sick and that is why you will never win this firearm argument in government. Or here.
I am no more responsible for this senseless random murder of a 1 year old than you are responsible for the senseless deaths from obesity because you may own stock in Entenmann's and Burger King. You highlight RESPONSIBLE. Massive %ge of all firearm owners are responsible. How many firearms are in America? How many firearm owners? How many gun crimes? Generation after generation of Americans have legally possessed, used and maintained firearms of all types. With no incidents. With no violence and no arrests. No one hurt intentionally or unintentionally. The Adam Lanza's of the world are pure evil. Read about how long he planned the attack. These mass shootings are a miniscule %ge of the total number of firearm murders. Attack the majority not the minority.
270 million firearm in American civilian hands. Some say more. http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/united-states 8583 firearm murders in 2011. FBI UCR I can't find the illegal use of firearms overall as a total but even add for argument sake 1,000,000 times a year, 2739 times a day across America. 1,008,583 illegal uses of a firearm in 2011. Not counting the multiple use of the same firearm multiple times which most used illegally are used multiple times, we have what percentage of all firearms used illegally? I leave the answer to you. I am not willing to give up my right to keep and bear any more than it has been infringed to date. Any more than I am willing to give up any of my other rights to anyone who did not give them to me.
You posted a lie and now cannot defend it so you insult. It is apparent.
Than damn teabaggers wrote that damn document!
Why can't we do that today? Oh wait! We can! DECLARATION OF RIGHTS. We, the People of the State of Maryland, grateful to Almighty God for our civil and religious liberty, and taking into our serious consideration the best means of establishing a good Constitution in this State for the sure foundation and more permanent security thereof, declare: Article 1. That all Government of right originates from the People, is founded in compact only, and instituted solely for the good of the whole; and they have, at all times, the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their Form of Government in such manner as they may deem expedient. Art. 2. The Constitution of the United States, and the Laws made, or which shall be made, in pursuance thereof, and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, are, and shall be the Supreme Law of the State; and the Judges of this State, and all the People of this State, are, and shall be bound thereby; anything in the Constitution or Law of this State to the contrary notwithstanding. Art. 3. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution thereof, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people thereof. OH NO!!! FIFI!!! They mention GOD!!!! What are we to do? How could our Founders have believed in GOD!
"voters last year approved by a sweeping majority a constitutional amendment backed by the National Rifle Association. Don't worry JoeBlob nobody is gonna take your ManMaker away from you.
The numbers are even worse than I posted! Is there an argument with the source?
Here are some other facts. The United States has the highest rate of gun ownership in the world — by far. And it has the highest rate of homicides among advanced countries. And yet, gun crime has been declining in the U.S. Firearm murders are down, as is overall gun violence – even as gun ownership increases. Read our Analysis for more insight on what these statistics mean. Source problems or complaints?
Why Westboro Steve did you leave this part of your comment out? "making a big" push? Is that the same to you as "push"? Get help Steve. You are relegated to word games instead of ideas.
Its delusional thinking and at least under the new gun laws people like Steve would be banned from owning guns. Adrian Reast