White Student Union Speaker Preaches Racial Separateness

More than 200 people visited Towson University to hear Jared Taylor, a self-described "racial realist."

A prospective White Student Union at Towson University added to its own controversial history when it brought an advocate for white interests to speak Tuesday at the group's first meeting.

Jared Taylor, editor of the "racial realism" online news site American Renaissance, said he hoped to spread a message about the importance of racial separateness.

"I believe in complete freedom of association, and when given that choice most people prefer the company of people of their own race," said Taylor, when reached by phone Wednesday. "We're always being told to celebrate diversity and I think diversity is a source of tension."

Many people, including a Patch reporter and other media, were denied admission to the Tuesday night event by campus security after the venue, which holds about 200, filled to capacity. Still, about 50 individuals stood outside the doors as Taylor spoke.

Taylor said his presentation centered around his support for the White Student Union and speaking out against diversity. He acknowledged that the audience reception was lukewarm—"some liked it, some didn't."

The White Student Union began recruiting members at Towson University a few months ago.This occurred shortly after Youth for Western Civilization, a group headed by current White Student Union President Matthew Heimbach, disbanded following allegations that its members scrawled "white pride" in chalk at locations around campus.

Youth for Western Civilization's faculty advisor Richard Vatz, who is also a Patch blogger, resigned from his post after the chalk-writing incident, noting in his resignation letter  that he "cannot in good conscience advise a group that attacks people or groups personally or tactlessly or does not recognize their dignity and the value of dignified argument in the marketplace of ideas."

Heimbach, who did not return calls for comment on this article, previously said both groups were about celebrating white heritage and advocating for white interests, not supremacy.

"It's a spectacular double standard that only whites are singled out and told they can't have a race-based organization," said Taylor, who argued that the group is necessary as demographics change making whites a minority.

Taylor said he presented evidence showing problems raised by diversity, such as data indicating that approximately 100,000 job grievances are related to racial matters. He also pointed to racial riots that occur in prisons. Taylor empathized with whites who felt the need to join gangs in prison because he said there are many black and Hispanic gangs existing outside of prison whose networks extend to jails.

But he did admit there was one benefit to diversity.

"I do enjoy ethnic food," he said.

Many attendees were not impressed with Taylor's presentation.

During his speech, Taylor said several people sneaked inside the venue through a fire escape and shouted an obscenity at him. Gay Pinder, a Towson University spokeswoman who was in attendance, said she just heard one person yell at the end of the presentation. She said the individual left through the rear door immediately after making the proclamation.

"It was generally a well-behaved crowd," Pinder said.

Raymond Winbush, the director of The Institute for Urban Research at Morgan State University, said the presentation was deceptive.

"[Taylor's] lying," said Winbush, who is black. "He's good at manipulating words and says he's not racist. It's like the white collar Ku Klux Klan."

Towson University senior Ignacio Evans, who is also black, thought Taylor was well-spoken but called his speech "absolutely disgusting."

"He was eloquent, put together, but inherently racist," Evans said. "He was very anti-diversity and made assertions that people of color are inferior."

Taylor dismissed the claims of racism as "name-calling."

"[Calling someone racist is] something someone will say when they don't have an argument," he said. 

Frankie Knight, a white senior family science student who didn't know much about the White Student Union, came to the meeting after hearing about it from her professor.

"I thought it was very negative and very offensive," she said.

Knight and Evans both noted that Taylor said blacks are genetically inferior. He denied making the statement.

"I have said the races are different....there are unquestionable differences," Taylor said.

And Taylor was not without supporters. Johns Hopkins University engineering professor Dennis Nagle, who is white, said he believes there is truth to Taylor's teachings.

"He's got some interesting views on diversity that aren't popular," said Nagle, who was not able to get inside the event. "But he's got evidence and documentation to back it up."

The White Student Union is not a university-recognized student organization, but the group's leaders are working to make it approved. Because they don't yet have that status, the White Student Union had to book the Towson University venue for the presentation as an outside entity.

George Wells October 05, 2012 at 06:44 PM
Better to use the term "self-determination" than segregation because segregation has a lot of anti-white bias built into it. People can separate along common elements, race or interest. Why is that not okay? Why do you want to suppress natural inclinations of Whites to unite as White people? Integration is another value not supported by nature. Its part of your anti-white value system that gives more value to an ideology rather than loyalty to people, that is flesh and blood. That's how psychopaths prosper in this world, convert people from loyalty to their group and the peace and security that brings into loyalty to an idea. You are a despicable anti-white. Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.
Tony R October 05, 2012 at 07:07 PM
http://www.amren.com/news/2012/10/jared-taylor-at-towson-university-the-case-for-white-identity/ Here is the video of Mr.taylor's talk.You may draw your personal conclusions unfiltered by the author or those quoted.
Skeptic October 05, 2012 at 11:51 PM
"she specifically made the false assertion that “Whites are not remotely threatened as a group.” " The assertion is not false. You are only threatened as a group if others deny you the freedom to dissociate from that group even if you want to. That has never been the case for white people. It is black people who have historically wanted to be judged as individuals but faced white people who viewed them not as individuals but as members of a "black" group. "Do you even know why the Jim Crow laws were enacted? To protect whites from black criminal behavior" This is a perfect example of what I am saying. Under Jim Crow, innocent until proven guilty did not apply to black people, because the system did not see them as individuals but as a group. This is what it means to be threatened as a group. "Why don’t you try asking the National Black Congress" See my earlier comment (third one down). The National Black Congress accepts partially black people as black. It is white organizations which refuse to accept partially white people as white. Therefore the National Black Congress will increasingly unite Americans as we become mixed, whereas white organizations try to divide Americans as we become mixed. "What good has the last 50+ years of integration done for whites?" That's like asking: what good has giving women the vote done for men? It's about fairness. Judging people by color (or gender) is unfair because nobody chooses what color (or gender) they are.
Skeptic October 06, 2012 at 12:08 AM
"People can separate along common elements, race or interest. Why is that not okay?" Because race is not something we choose. To prohibit someone from joining a group because of race is to punish him for something he had no control over. I should ask you: what is wrong with judging people by the content of their character?
Uncle Pen October 06, 2012 at 07:13 AM
What a tour de force Jared Taylor's speech was! He's probably the best expositor the white movement has! But Jared must have left the second half of his speech at home: "And now I'll explain how all of what I've just told you furthers the anti-whites' world-wide program of white genocide"!
Michael Tisdale October 06, 2012 at 09:09 AM
Mike I am concern about the feelings we have toward one another at a time when young men and woman of all colors and nationalities are dieing fighting for rights of people on both sides of issue. Is there no shame. God dam America!
George Wells October 06, 2012 at 07:25 PM
Skeptic, Horse sh*t. Whites are threatened with extinction in a few generations unless freedom of association is restored to White people. White genocide TODAY trumps any allegations from the distant past. When we have: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody, what do we have overtime? We have solid Black only and Solid Asian only countries, exclusively for Blacks and Asians, based upon exclusive genetics and culture. Culture is respected and so tolerable to these groups. They do not need to tolerate massive inflows of invaders and made to tolerate foreign cultures. We have more and more non-whites in White countries since the right of Whites to exclusive territory is denied them. We have fewer and fewer White people. How is this not White genocide? Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white. When we mix more non-whites and fewer Whites in the same living space, what do we get? In time, White extinction. Its called White genocide because this does not happen by chance. It is being forced upon Whites just like a rapist does not take no for an answer. How is this not so? How is this not White genocide? Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.
George Wells October 06, 2012 at 11:09 PM
You make me want to weep, weep more for the ongoing genocide of the White race. Respect all, but blend Whites out of existence? That's genocide. When you force upon a declining white race (whites are not having enough babies to replace themselves), massive numbers of non-whites, to share the same homeland/living space, the end result is the elimination of the declining white race. Its inevitable. The White race is declining wile non-white races are rising. The causes could be explored. Instead we merely have approval and justifying of this White genocide. We could ask how can we reverse this trend so Whites can continue to occupy traditional White homelands and not be replaced by non-whites couldn't we? Why is it not part of social discourse? When we have: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody, what do we have overtime? No White people.
Winston Jack October 06, 2012 at 11:14 PM
@Skeptic "The assertion is not false. You are only threatened as a group if others deny you the freedom to dissociate from that group even if you want to. That has never been the case for white people." Freedom to dissociate was exactly what was denied to Whites through anti-discrimination laws, affirmative action, race based quotas, forced school integration, and Section 8 housing among other things. Paid for mainly by Whites I might add. "Therefore the National Black Congress will increasingly unite Americans as we become mixed..." So in other words, your idea of unity is to mongrelize the White race out of existence so we can all be one. In other words, White genocide. "Because race is not something we choose." 'Race is not something we choose' is no excuse for White genocide. 'Prohibiting someone from joining a group' is no excuse for White genocide. 'Judging people by color or gender is unfair' is no excuse for White genocide. Why are you an advocate for White genocide? p.s. If you want to do some "character content" judging, then click on the link a few posts down, watch the video, and note the obnoxious and idiotic behavior of the black "students".
Skeptic October 07, 2012 at 02:32 AM
George, you did not bother to address my points. You are just copying and pasting your mantra yet again. You are behaving like a parrot. There are no countries exclusively for blood type A people. There are no countries exclusively for short-sighted people. There are no countries exclusively for people who can roll their tongues. What would you think if all these people suddenly started complaining about genocide? Would you laugh at them? That is why I laugh at you. WIllN already owned you above on the Native American topic, so let's talk about some other groups, such as the Aboriginal Australians and the Maoris of New Zealand. Don't they have to tolerate foreign culture on what used to be their territory? So why do you not ask for Australia and New Zealand to be returned to them?
Reginald Charleston October 07, 2012 at 02:42 AM
Guess what? The United Nations defines genocide as ANYTHING creating conditions which over the long run will make it impossible for a people to preserve its distinct identity. These things include mass immigration, forced integration, promoting miscegenation, and the propaganda of White guilt. Genocide does not have to be PHYSICAL destruction. Read the LEGAL definition of genocide. Genocide includes MENTAL harm. Like everyone is saying, anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.
George Wells October 08, 2012 at 11:30 PM
Skeptic, you comments of course are ridiculous. The White race is a reality which you want to deny so you can justify White genocide. You have many anti-white narratives as arrows in your bag of weapons. When we have: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody, what do we have overtime? We have fewer White people. We have more non-white people in White countries. When we add integration laws and coerced tolerance we have more an more assimilation which in the end means the extinction of the White race. How is this not so? Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white. Of all the anti-whites I've mean, I've found nothing that can deter them from being pro-white genocide. I'm still looking for a magic bullet. Maybe you are bullet proof.
Kaba October 09, 2012 at 09:37 PM
Google the name "Bill Riccio", people. That's all you need to know about Taylor's support base. Anti-racists don't need codewords.
Kaba October 09, 2012 at 09:39 PM
When your argument is that everyone else is as bad as you, you have lost.
George Wells October 09, 2012 at 10:30 PM
Kaba, it proves a double standard and that those who condemn Whites are just anti-white. Its not possible to measure who is worse. its sufficient to see the double standard and call anti-whites on it. That's a good label for them, anti-white. Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.
Kaba October 10, 2012 at 04:41 PM
George Wells, one thing though. If you see some sort of double standard, does that mean you and Mickey will acknowledge the rape and pillaging of Africa that Europeans engaged in, to include slavery, or will you pretend they were mere witnesses to it all because it helps to justify ho wrong you are? Anti-Racists don't need codewords. Racists need excuses.
Kaba October 10, 2012 at 04:43 PM
Reginald, not everyone is saying that anti-racist line. Just folks on the Internet who can't think for themselves and have to be instructed to do so. Why would you want the rest of us to live such a shallow life as yours?
George Wells October 10, 2012 at 11:06 PM
So you are not an anti-racist? You don't assault Whites with the R world when you want to feel self-righteous? You don't have the need to do so? I would like to follow you around if I could to be sure you are not an anti-racist. When people try to block the White genocide message I always wonder of they are doing that because they are just anti-white. They do you think people stand in the why of the White genocide message?
George Wells October 10, 2012 at 11:17 PM
That's a loaded question. I am against all human rights violations in principle. The whole issue of slavery needs to be explored. The way you have phrased the question implies that Whites are the guilty ones. Whites have been the victims of slavery as much as any race. The slave industry is still alive and well although White civilization has worked hard to eliminate it. has any other race tried to eliminate slavery? As an industry, we should look at the brokers, ship owners, financiers, and the plantation owners, not the middle of the rode White man who may have been indentured or a wage slave. Today the big guys, descendants of those who profited by this industry are the anti-white global elites. But the average White guy has been scapegoated and blamed for the abuses. White guilt is all about this as support for the ongoing genocide of the White race. Anti-racists, as you said, because they have the supreme codeword, the R word, proving they are just anti-white. You seem to be very comfortable with being an accomplice to genocide. Now that's anti-racist for you.
George Wells October 10, 2012 at 11:18 PM
You are so right.
Winston Jack October 11, 2012 at 06:35 AM
“As an industry, we should look at the brokers, ship owners, financiers, and the plantation owners, not the middle of the rode White man who may have been indentured or a wage slave.” Not to mention the Arabs who worked as middle men (as they had for centuries), along with the numerous African chieftains who were all too happy to raid, kidnap, and sell their own people into slavery. The trans-Atlantic slave trade would have been impossible without their help and co-operation. “The slave industry is still alive and well although White civilization has worked hard to eliminate it.” Still thriving in parts of Africa, interestingly enough. Just a few inconvenient facts the anti-Whites forget to mention when they try to regurgitate the 200+ year guilt trip of slavery.
George Wells October 11, 2012 at 10:09 PM
Winston Jack, yes. They do confirm the observation that "Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white." When a person hates White people, that person needs to distort history to put White people in an unfairly bad light. And of course they want to blame White people today who had nothing what so ever to do with the accusation. Even those White people who had ancestors that were slaves or indentured servants.
Mstr Rick November 22, 2012 at 01:30 PM
The African ones seemed quite angry at the loss of their exclusive status as a protected group, I think white people should be able to organize and advance their own interests just like every other group of people. Every ethnic group in America is taught to be proud of their race and ethnicity, except white people. America has black television channels, black magazines, black student organizations, black lobbying groups, black scholarships and black barber shops. These groups recognize that they share some common ancestry and some common interests, and they organize to assert those interests. A multicultural, multiracial, melting pot society that forbids only one ethnic group from preserving its culture and organizing to further its own interests is criminally hypocritical. Challenging this deeply entrenched anti-white bias is a moral imperative. I'm white, and I'm proud of my white heritage, culture, and history, as I should be.
John Andrews November 23, 2012 at 12:25 AM
HAHA...Jews were the biggest slave traders in existence and also slave owners in this country...GOOGLE ISREAL COHEN 1912 and you will realize what these animals are doing to our race...it's written in plain black and white!!!
John Andrews November 23, 2012 at 12:28 AM
Most of these blacks that comment to Mr. Taylor are Students at Historically Black (Seperatist & IMO Racist) Colleges so their arguments are not only very uneducated but also extremely Biggoted!!! Know the history before you present your racist rants Africans...Thank you!!!
George Wells November 23, 2012 at 09:15 PM
To be Black and be proud is sort of holy and sacred. To be White and be proud is a grave sin, sure to be met with the slur "anazikkkracistwhowantstokillsixmillionjews." This hypocrisy needs end.
john sullivan December 28, 2012 at 04:03 AM
George Wells December 28, 2012 at 05:20 PM
Genocide is the death of a race. Whose talking about superiority that's just noise in their brain. Whites are endangered as a race agreed? Then we have an effort in all White countries to force mass#s of non-whites into White living space, agreed? Then we have laws forcing integration, coercion of tolerance and social control methods pushing assimilation with interracial mating/dating. We see that agreed? We see many now of mix race, fewer Whites, more non-Whites. Its White genocide. Let's just have equal rights for Whites.
Michael April 23, 2013 at 04:12 PM
Look up "Americans faking hate crimes" and look up "Proof of Anti-white racism at the National Union of Journalists" on youtube. Racist means you are against the genocide of your own people. Whites don't want to lose their culture and want to promote it. You can't promote white culture with a mixed race couple. Racism is a social construct invented by Jews who divide and conquer over all races.
George Wells April 27, 2013 at 09:12 PM
Don't forget to watch YT video ANTIRACIST HITLER before it is banned. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=lKDeyuM0-Og


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something